Skip to main content

Irwin Cotler is a former justice minister and attorney-general of Canada in Paul Martin’s Liberal government and emeritus professor of international law at McGill University. Brandon Silver is director of policy and projects at the Montreal-based Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights.

Canada’s 43rd federal election has come and gone, and regardless of where one stands on the results, it was a testament to the values we cherish as a member of the international liberal-democratic order, one that has secured unprecedented peace and prosperity. But in this era of increasing health, wealth and human achievement, a growing culture of complacency in Canada puts these successes at risk.

Authoritarian states are on the rise, and with the mass repression inside their borders likely to quickly turn into aggression outside them, we must redouble our efforts to pursue justice globally in order to protect Canadians locally. And the emerging call for a foreign policy of appeasement and a maintenance of the international status quo is dangerous.

Story continues below advertisement

A “reset” in relations with Vladimir Putin’s Russia resulted in the occupation of Ukraine and attacks on other democracies. Nicolas Maduro’s assault on his own people in Venezeula led to the largest refugee flow in the world today, as well as a resurgence of diseases that had once been eradicated. Under the malign despotism of Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Turkey, more than 100,000 people have been arbitrarily arrested, along with judges and journalists – and that has morphed into an onslaught against Kurdish freedom fighters in northeastern Syria, and is likely to lead to the return of Islamic State terror.

Recently re-elected Liberal Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland has compellingly confronted the resurgent global authoritarianism and illiberal populism that threaten our democratic way of life, especially in places like Ukraine, Venezuela and Saudi Arabia. But with some criticizing this approach as lacking in “nuance,” or denouncing it as a “moral crusade” in contradiction with the national interest, the new Liberal government might face pressure to change tack. The push-and-pull involved in retaining power in a minority parliament may also affect political considerations around what goals should be pursued.

But a backsliding world requires bold responses. Appeasing bad actors and embracing the status quo does not bring peace – it only encourages war and intensifies human suffering.

Canada's Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland speaks following a meeting with Britain's Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab in Toronto on Aug. 6, 2019.

Moe Doiron/Reuters

The Liberal government’s efforts to protect and promote Canadians’ freedom, safety and general quality of life – something best achieved through securing the rights of others, pursuing a more peaceful and just world, and challenging the authoritarianism that threatens it – have been commendable. Now, although constrained with a minority parliament, the Liberals should continue, anchored in three core tenets for defending democracy: development, diversification and denunciation.

First, as a bastion of stability in tumultuous times, Canada can share its best practices and stand with allies advancing our interests abroad. These allies are the democrats and dissidents on the front lines of the struggle for justice. Targeted grants and training can help galvanize these grassroots movements. Canada should prioritize such democratic development with an independent, non-partisan institution similar to the U.S. and European endowments for democracy – and different from the defunct International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development – to carry out the work with sustainable, multi-partisan support.

Second, dangerous trends necessitate greater diversification of our foreign relations. Much has been written of the pernicious effects of “sharp power” leveraged by authoritarian regimes in unbalanced relationships. Pivoting to established regional democracies can help provide a counterweight to its purveyors. In Asia, for instance, states such as South Korea, India and Japan are important partners for regional peace and for checking China’s expansionism. Our European allies – including Ukraine, Georgia and the Baltics – are protecting against Mr. Putin’s interventionism. Young Middle-Eastern democracies like Israel and Tunisia are a bulwark against the region’s extremists.

Great strides are being made for new democracies – the velvet revolution in Armenia and subsequent amnesties for political prisoners, the Nobel-winning democratic transition in Ethiopia and its subsequent peace with Eritrea, and free and fair elections in Moldova leading to the premiership of an anti-corruption activist. These seemingly scattered efforts form the basis of strong and sustainable partnerships anchored in and inspired by shared liberal-democratic values.

Story continues below advertisement

Finally, in both word and deed, Canada should clearly denounce democracy’s opponents, while demanding governments respect fundamental rights, to add important pressure and offer protective cover to victims. But strategic action is also needed to propel our policies forward. Such concrete measures can include more vigorous implementation of targeted Magnitsky sanctions – that is, visa bans and asset seizures against individual agents of repression – but should not preclude generalized economic and military embargoes. While multilateral action in that regard is always preferable, unilateral action – such as Canada’s courageous stand against apartheid in South Africa – can be a crucial contribution in the struggle for justice.

Mr. Trudeau’s government, even with a reduced caucus, should persist in enshrining and intensifying the protection and promotion of democracy as a Canadian foreign-policy priority. The achievement of peace and justice in our time – in Canada and internationally – demands no less.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies