Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

There was a powerful moment during Nishnawbe Aski Nation’s virtually attended general assembly council meeting, when Sipekne’katik First Nation Chief Mike Sack – who called in using a cellular phone – thanked the 49 northern Ontario chiefs and asked for prayers to keep his people safe.

Chief Sack felt so urgently that the Canadian government, the justice system and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were missing in action that he needed to ask for the power of love and divine intervention.

In recent weeks, Chief Sack and Mi’kmaq fishermen and women in Nova Scotia have faced domestic terror, whether the RCMP calls it that or not: Racist mobs seized and vandalized traps, burned vehicles and set their warehouse on fire.

Story continues below advertisement

The inept, callous behaviour by the Canadian government and the RCMP once again proves the extent of racism in this country, how it permeates into every department and organization and drives a wedge between us.

Police forces have the duty to protect all citizens – not just the non-Indigenous ones. How does RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki still have her job, after recently waffling on recognizing systemic racism in her ranks, and now her force’s failure to protect the Sipekne’katik?

Time and time again, Canada misunderstands what treaty rights are. Without these nation-to-nation agreements, Canadians would not have a country. These treaties have built this country and ensured non-Indigenous people could settle here and prosper. But both the Crown and government have carried on, since Confederation, as if the treaties are meaningless or simply do not exist.

It’s through these lenses that the Mi’kmaq view another declaration from the Crown. Twenty-one years ago, in two rulings known as the Marshall decisions, the Supreme Court of Canada said that, due to the treaties signed in 1760 and 1761 between the Crown and the Mi’kmaq, Maliseet and Passamaquoddy First Nations, the Mi’kmaq have a constitutional right to hunt, fish and gather for a “moderate livelihood.”

But ultimately and fundamentally, what the Supreme Court told the Mi’kmaq fishers was this: They hold a constitutionally protected right to fish in their own jurisdiction. Period.

There are many problems with the “moderate livelihood” limitation, explains Sara Mainville, a partner at the lawfirm Olthuis Kleer Townshend and former chief of Couchiching First Nation. It is, she says, “subjective, and that nature makes it illegitimate from both angles – as a treaty jurisdiction, why do we have to ensure we have a ‘cap’ on our exercise of a treaty protected commercial right?” And, as a Crown jurisdiction, “no one else has a similar cap or limitation.”

How is it possible to manage a moderate livelihood in a regulated environment where exploiting the resource without a worry about moderation is what large profit-focused companies are doing?

Story continues below advertisement

If Canada suddenly comes to the Mi’kmaq with a definition of what “moderate livelihood” means, decades later – well, good luck with that. The Mi’kmaq will decide, as is their right and as the treaties make clear. The courts and government have lost the privilege to outline what it means. The Mi’kmaq are acting as their own regulators, and should be allowed to do so.

Chief Sack told the NAN council that the Sipekne’katik are having a hard time with the “DFO protecting our people on the water,” and he implored Indigenous leaders to hold the DFO and the RCMP “accountable for their lack of actions.” If the Atlantic provinces were not closed off in a COVID-19 bubble, no doubt Indigenous people from nations across the country would have descended on St. Mary’s Bay.

Canada continually fails to understand that First Nations people have a right to hunt and protect the land. That’s laid out in our treaties, but it’s also embedded in our bones. For thousands of years, First Nations never took more than what was needed. The spirit of protection and conservation is in our identity; we provide for ourselves and if we have extra, we share.

Of course, conservation isn’t really a valid argument against the Sipekne’katik’s claim. They are not wreaking havoc on the East Coast lobster population. They have seven fishing licenses and are only using three, for a total of 150 traps, according to APTN. Even the DFO has said they pose no danger to destroying the stock. Still, we have to scrape and claw against bad-faith arguments, just to get what is owed to us.

Toward the end of Chief Sack’s call with the NAN chiefs, he passed around his cellphone to the assembled Sipekne’katik council members so they could introduce themselves to the national representatives. When Councillor Gavin Michael took the phone, he talked about being a fisherman himself “that is out there, doing it.” Then he added: “The boys are getting tired, the fisherwomen are getting tired down here, we appreciate all the support we can get.”

It would be appreciated if all Canadians did the right thing, for the good of the entire country, and stood up and behind the Sipekne’katik, too. Until then, all Chief Sack can do is pray.

Story continues below advertisement

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies