Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Naomi Buck is a Toronto-based writer.

For many families battling the turbulent storm of last spring’s lockdown, digital devices provided islands of calm; children parked on them were finally quiet, content and undemanding.

A Statistics Canada survey of parents across Canada found that screen time trumped all other activities – including games, reading and physical activity – among their kids last spring, while research out of the University of Western Ontario estimates that school-aged kids in Ontario were spending a daily average of 5.8 hours on screens, not including online schooling. That’s concerning to experts who find negative correlations between excessive screen time and children’s mental, physical and emotional wellbeing.

Story continues below advertisement

Now that school has resumed, parents are being advised to rein their kids back in. That’s not easy at the best of times given the ubiquitous and addictive nature of the devices in question. And pandemic schooling, with its heavy reliance on screens, is making it virtually impossible.

The pandemic has turbocharged digital education, driving hundreds of thousands of Canadian school kids into their homes to receive e-learning, but also providing a rationale to dramatically increase the use of devices in schools. Online learners can transition more easily to remote learning in the event of quarantines or further lockdowns, so the reasoning goes, and devices reduce the possibility of fomite transmission in the classroom, with no paper passing between teacher and student.

“It’s kind of like online learning,” said my Grade 7 son, after his first week back at school, “except that we’re in school.” He was going to school armed with both a laptop and a phone, claiming this was the requisite rig. By the second week, he was requesting earphones as well; his teacher had suggested listening to music when doing “boring” work.

In the intervening months, my son has shown me the online assignments, tests and projects that constitute most of his schoolwork. Videos are regularly shown in lieu of instruction, digital flash cards are used to teach French, and inane online texts followed by multiple choice questions that glow when answered correctly are used to hone reading skills. Many of the online learning resources are riddled with factual and grammatical errors while random blog entries are used for literary analysis. Recently, my son showed me an assigned text that culminated in this statement: “Bullying is a highly underestimated subject with long term problems following it’s tail.” He was struggling to identify the metaphor.

With material of this quality, it’s hardly surprising that students are using the propped-up laptops on their desks as visual shields to conceal the phones vibrating madly in their laps. This is the 21st-century equivalent of note-passing. Throughout the day, my son and his classmates send TikToks back and forth, plan their upcoming mask breaks (de facto recess) and gather online to play rounds of “Among Us,” the video game du jour, relieving the boredom of class with quick virtual trips to outer space to kill each other.

This is not meant to blow the cover on one particularly deviant class, but rather to note a new variation on an old theme: student subversion of classroom technology. In Grade 4, my son’s teacher regularly rewarded good behaviour with 20 minutes of unfettered access to YouTube at the end of the day, leaving the class to view a trove of vile online content that had slipped through the school board’s filter.

Despite such aberrations, schools – and parents – have been quick to embrace technology in the classroom. Educational authorities rave about its potential to foster digital fluency, global competency and deeper learning. The overarching concern has been about equity: ensuring that all kids have equal access to the digital goods.

Story continues below advertisement

While there’s no question that screens can be put to creative, innovative, horizon-expanding use in the classroom, it’s important to keep honest. At school, as at home, technology can be used to simply keep kids busy. That’s a very attractive proposition to a teacher of 27 students left under-exercised and over-screened by a pandemic. But the challenge of the moment is to combat, not to indulge, their dependency.

As its role in education expands, the use of technology should be subject to rigorous oversight. Teachers need more guidance on how to make productive use of the ever-increasing range of digital tools at their disposal. School boards should consider throwing less money at new devices, and more at teacher training and support.

And we have to stop thinking about screen time in terms of quantity. The Canadian Paediatric Society’s recommendation of a daily maximum of two hours of recreational screen time for school-age kids hardly applies in a world where devices have crept into every aspect of their lives. The real question is one of quality: What is being gained through the use of screens and what is being lost? It needs to be asked at school as much as at home.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies