Skip to main content

Opinion China’s ‘new era’ diplomats are acting distinctly undiplomatic

Frank Ching is a Hong Kong-based journalist.

Chinese diplomats around the world seem to have become increasingly assertive in the aftermath of President Xi Jinping’s declaration last year that a new era had arrived that would see China moving closer to centre stage.

In recent weeks, China’s embassies, especially a few in Europe, have been making statements and taking actions that appear distinctly undiplomatic.

Story continues below advertisement

In Sweden, a dispute between a hotel and a family of three from China who arrived a day earlier than their booking and refused to leave the lobby ended with the hotel calling the police. The three had to be carried from the Generator hostel in Stockholm, with one of them screaming at officers.

The Chinese embassy charged that the police “brutally abused” and “severely endangered the life” of the Chinese tourists and asked for an apology.

In the United Kingdom, an event on Hong Kong held on the sidelines of the Conservative Party’s annual conference was disrupted when a Chinese woman interrupted closing remarks by Benedict Rogers, a British human-rights activist. “I am pro-China, not anti-China. I want China and its people to succeed,” she said, according to The New York Times.

The woman, identified later as a Chinese reporter, did not ask a question but shouted: “You are a liar. You are anti-China. You want to separate China. And you are not even Chinese.” Then, referring to the participants from Hong Kong, she said, “The rest are all traitors!” A video of the event showed that when asked to leave, she slapped a volunteer.

It turned out that she was the representative of CGTN, China’s state-run international broadcaster.

The Chinese embassy didn’t take long to intervene. It denounced the organizers of the talk and said Kong Linlin was assaulted for merely asking questions.

“In a country that boasts freedom of speech, it is puzzling that the Chinese journalist should encounter obstruction in such a way and even assault at the fringe event when she simply raised a question and expressed her opinions,” the statement continued. “This is completely unacceptable.”

Story continues below advertisement

Last week, Ms. Kong was charged with assault. She will appear in court on a date to be set.

This past Sunday, the Chinese embassy in Berlin denounced Sueddeutsche Zeitung, one of the largest German newspapers, for publishing an interview with Joseph Wu, foreign minister of Taiwan, an island that China claims as part of its territory. An embassy spokesman said the newspaper provided “Taiwan independence” secessionists with media access.

The interview was conducted by Kai Strittmatter, a highly experienced journalist and author who is the paper’s China correspondent. Mr. Strittmatter said in his article that Taiwan is a big potential trouble spot and is now a focus in Washington and Beijing. An interview with its foreign minister is certainly justifiable from a news standpoint.

However, the Chinese embassy spokesman did not view the article for its news value but rather for sheer politics. The embassy spokesman asked the German government to prevent the German press from publishing such articles in the future, hinting that bilateral relations could be disrupted.

The official Xinhua News Agency reported: “The spokesman said China always supports the national unity of Germany, thereby it hopes Germany to take the same attitude to China. Germany needs to realize that the ‘Taiwan independence’ secessionist activities on its soil would disrupt and harm China-Germany bilateral relations and regional stability.”

China has repeatedly voiced its opposition to what it calls “long-arm jurisdiction” by other countries against Chinese entities or individuals.

Story continues below advertisement

Now, it appears, China is flexing its muscles and putting pressure on foreign governments regarding events occurring on foreign soil.

China is trying to deepen the international isolation of Taiwan wherever possible. But increasingly, it is not only telling governments but also private businesses and the media what to do and what not to do.

Since the 1950s, China has promised never to interfere in other countries’ internal affairs. But now, it is even telling them to ditch their core values, such as respect for a free press, if they value their relationship with Beijing.

China’s diplomats should remember that what Mr. Xi said at the 19th party congress last year was not just that the new era would see China moving closer to centre stage, but that it would do so and make “greater contributions to mankind.”

As Mr. Xi certainly knows, there is a huge difference between making contributions to mankind and expanding China’s national interests by browbeating other countries and interfering in their internal affairs.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter