Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Frank Addario is a lawyer in Toronto.

A man found guilty of second-degree murder for beating an 82-year-old woman to death in her home. Another man convicted in the premeditated killing of a workmate. Two friends found to have committed a sexual assault in a bar so hideous that their three-week trial convulsed Toronto.

All four of them have something in common: They will likely get new trials.

Story continues below advertisement

This legal mayhem is the direct result of an Ontario Court of Appeal decision last week, which found that a legislative change in the law that governed jury selection was incorrectly applied by Ontario judges at the urging of Crown lawyers in dozens of cases tried since September. Serious convictions seem certain to fall as a result; weeks of court time and millions of taxpayer dollars will have been flushed away. Surviving victims will face the horror of testifying – again. Defendants will be forced to sit on a knife’s edge, their lives hanging in the balance while their families or an overburdened legal aid system dig deep to finance another trial.

This chaos was eminently avoidable.

It started in Saskatchewan. The acquittal of Biggar, Sask., farmer Gerald Stanley in the death of Indigenous man Colten Boushie prompted allegations of racism in the jury selection process. And in an unusual statement for someone in her position, Jody Wilson-Raybould – at the time, the federal justice minister and attorney-general – publicly denounced the verdict: “As a country we can and must do better."

In response, the ruling Liberals proposed eliminating peremptory challenges, whereby the Crown and defence can each reject a certain number of potential jurors during the jury selection process without having to furnish reasons. Courtroom lawyers and legal organizations told Ms. Wilson-Raybould that this would not solve the problem of racist juries, but, the change – part of the Liberals’ Bill C-75 – came into law anyway on Sept. 19 of last year.

Worse than being ineffective, though, the law was enigmatic. The bill did not clearly explain whether the change to peremptory challenges should apply to the trials of defendants already in the system, or only to those charged after the law came into force, kicking off a legal guessing game for the provincial and territorial attorneys-general who enforce the criminal law. Most chose to ask judges take a sober, low-risk approach toward a prospective interpretation; that is, they accepted it would not affect cases already in the system.

Ontario Attorney-General Doug Downey, however, opted for a hardcore litigation strategy: His office authorized his Crown prosecutors to go ahead and invite judges to eliminate peremptory challenges in continuing cases.

It was a gamble that exposed taxpayers, defendants and victims to egregious consequences. At least one Ontario judge, forced to decide the issue, worried aloud that if he guessed wrong, it would nullify the entire forthcoming trial. And then came the Court of Appeal ruling, holding that those who opted for a trial by jury before Sept. 19 had the right to use peremptory challenges denied to them, meaning their juries had been illegally put together.

Story continues below advertisement

A sober-minded attorney-general would have headed straight to the Court of Appeal when the law passed last summer to seek a reference, a tool routinely used to resolve questions of legal uncertainly. Such references bring swift guidance to lawyers, and most importantly, the human cost is nil: No defendants, victims or families would be put through the gruelling emotional ride of a potential second criminal trial. Mr. Downey’s ministry knew about the option but never chose it. Even after a strikingly similar case in November, in which the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that new restrictions on preliminary hearings were prospective, Mr. Downey declined to change his strategy.

I am often asked by non-lawyers why the legal system can’t get people charged with serious crimes to trial in a reasonable time. What, they ask, is wrong with the system? Usually, I fall back on the answer that it’s complicated, because usually it is. But this debacle, with its attendant chaos, has an obvious and singular cause: Mr. Downey and his terrible legal strategy.

Yes, Ontario can appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, and yes, that court might even reverse the decision. But meanwhile, hundreds of defendants, victims, and families will sit in limbo as the 30-month speedy trial clock ticks away – all because of the Ontario attorney-general’s gamble.

Despite being the architect of this mess, Mr. Downey, a member of a Progressive Conservative government that preaches personal responsibility to ordinary people, has been silent so far. If he cannot own up to causing this chaos, he does not deserve his job.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies