Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
Sale ends in
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
save over $140
// //

Michael Orsini is a professor in the Institute of Feminist and Gender Studies and the School of Political Studies at the University of Ottawa. Deborah McPhail is associate professor of community health sciences at the University of Manitoba and author of Contours of the Nation: Making Obesity and Imagining Canada, 1945–1970.

A flurry of media attention greeted the release earlier this month of new clinical guidelines for treating “obesity.” Dubbed a “paradigm shift,” these guidelines are summarized and published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal. The authors elaborate on the guidelines on the website of Obesity Canada, which oversaw this project with the Canadian Association of Bariatric Physicians and Surgeons.

Calling on health care workers and policy-makers to address weight bias and stigma – what others call fatphobia – the authors make five key recommendations, including asking permission “to offer advice and help treat this disease in an unbiased manner,” and assisting a patient with “identifying the root causes, complications and barriers to obesity treatment.”

Story continues below advertisement

So, what is wrong with tackling bias and stigma? After all, many support efforts to counter stigma and fatphobia in society and especially in health care institutions.

The trouble with the guidelines – and other efforts to encourage so-called “healthy living” – is that they seek to sensitize others to the dangers of stigma but cling to a model that pathologizes obesity as a disease. While the authors acknowledge that the body mass index (BMI) is a poor measure of health, they still circle back to weight loss or bariatric surgery as possible “treatments.” So obesity may be complex, but it is still seen as a disease that can be managed medically.

Many scientists, scholars and fat activists alike reject the notion that their bodies are diseased, and encourage us to see fatness as a healthy form of bodily diversity. They use the term “fat” deliberately to reclaim a word that has been used to harm people.

Many obesity researchers steer clear of the term fat, preferring people-first language such as “person living with obesity,” which they say humanizes fat people. But were fat people not quite human in the first place? People-first language is not somehow instantly empowering. Some communities reject it because it distances the person from their identity. For instance, saying “disabled person” can be seen as less pathologizing than “person with a disability.” And disability communities can teach all of us a thing or two about having your humanity called into question.

Fat people are not the only victims of hatred and discrimination, of course. The structures and systems that devalue fat bodies are linked to other forms of oppression rooted in race, gender and ability. There is much to learn, for instance, from connecting the dots between fat oppression and racism.

In her recent book, Fearing the Black Body: The Racial Origins of Fat Phobia, author Sabrina Strings explains how fatphobia is rooted in white supremacy, arguing that “the slender ideal and fat phobia are not distinct developments... The fear of the imagined ‘fat black woman’ was created by racial and religious ideologies that have been used to both degrade black women and discipline white women.”

Health care for fat people is still delivered in a system with a firm hierarchy between patient and health care provider. Suggesting that physicians refrain from raising the issue of weight unless their patient does seems naive at best. Patients are hardly in a position to push back against a fatphobic or racist physician. This is not a marketplace in which individual patients simply move on to the next physician if they don’t like the service they are receiving.

Story continues below advertisement

Fat people avoid visiting doctors because they dread being the object of shame and judgment. In 2018, Ellen Maud Bennett died of complications from cancer after spending years being told that she would feel better if she just lost weight. She took the unusual step of writing her own obituary to call attention to fat shaming. Physicians use a dehumanizing, “secret language” to talk about their fat patients.

Fatphobia is fuelled by outdated ideas about “normal” bodies, and by the suggestion that individuals should know better than to let their weight spiral out of control. Despite evidence of the pernicious effects of the weight-loss industry, there is a stubborn acceptance that by managing our weight, we can gain personal and social transformation.

Efforts that purport to turn the page on weight bias need to genuinely move beyond weight as a measure of health, rather than wrap their interventions in the cloak of anti-stigma.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies