Skip to main content

When will kids get back to school?

There is probably no more fearsome and divisive debate in Canada today.

Caught in the middle are parents (and mothers, in particular) who want the best for their children, but who are also being crushed under the triple burden of working from home, home-schooling and parenting without respite.

Story continues below advertisement

If there is one certainty, it is that economic recovery and parental sanity won’t happen until schools and daycares are fully operational again.

Opinions on the school reopening question range from, “There can be no in-classroom teaching until there is an effective vaccine,” to, “Kids should be back in class now because the coronavirus poses little risk to them.”

Neither of these extreme positions is defensible.

As school resumes and the pandemic continues, will physical distancing help or hurt our kids?

COVID-19 pandemic will reshape how Canadian kids experience school in the next academic year

Opinion: We can get children back to school full time, if we put the right strategy in place

There may be a coronavirus vaccine someday – in a year or two – or maybe not. Even if there is, we don’t know how quickly children can be vaccinated, or how effective it will be.

Keeping Canada’s 5.5 million students out of their classrooms for years, condemned to schooling at home via Zoom, is a non-starter.

Education is not just a debate between book-based and digital learning. What you learn in the classroom, the schoolyard or the lunchroom is how to navigate life, how to be independent, how to compete and co-operate, how to make friends and resolve conflict, how to adapt to (or resist) rules and societal norms. It’s a place to play and grow, physically and emotionally.

This crucial interactive learning can’t be done at a distance. Children and youth of all ages need to get back into the classroom.

Story continues below advertisement

At the same time, we can’t be cavalier about the return to school. We are still in the midst of a pandemic.

The argument that is often trotted out in favour of returning – that young people who are infected with coronavirus don’t get that sick – is glib. They seem to get less sick, but the virus still isn’t harmless. Children can also transmit the coronavirus to others, including teachers, parents and grandparents.

While there is contradictory research on this key issue, the current consensus seems to be that children under 10 are about half as likely as adults to transmit the virus, but older children are comparable to adults.

The real-world evidence is mixed. In Israel, there have been huge school-based outbreaks. In countries such as Finland and Denmark, the return to school has not caused a blip in cases.

How many coronavirus cases are there in Canada?

It’s been six months since COVID-19 came to Canada. Here are some of the lives we’ve lost

While the spread of coronavirus is relatively under control in Canada (knock on wood!), we are not out of the woods.

Six months into the pandemic and six weeks shy of the traditional post-Labour Day return to school, the question we need to ask is not, “Should kids return to school?” The question we need to ask and answer is: How can we ensure that children return to school as safely as possible?

Story continues below advertisement

The single best way to ensure schools can reopen safely is to ensure there is no community spread. And when there is, we need to be able to catch cases quickly and limit spread with efficient contact tracing.

When children go back to school, there will be transmission of COVID-19. We have to accept that there is no risk-free scenario.

But again, the real issue lies in balancing the risks and the benefits.

The benefits of attending school in person are many. The way to minimize harm is with now-familiar public-health measures such as handwashing, physical distancing, limiting the size of groups and mask-wearing (at least for older kids).

Practically, that means smaller class sizes, creating cohorts of students, ensuring not all students are scheduled to eat lunch in the cafeteria at the same time, and limiting some activities, including choir practice.

One of the most controversial measures up for debate is a proposal to stagger school attendance for students. Ontario, for example, has considered having students attend school three days one week and two days the next, with online learning in-between. That’s a good approach on paper, but a nightmare for working parents.

Story continues below advertisement

There is no single best way to reopen schools; it’s going to be a tricky calculus. But this is a time when Canadian pragmatism, and a little bit of imagination, can serve us well.

Governments and school boards, however, need to stop dithering and propose clear reopening plans so we can debate, discuss and tweak them.

Getting children back in the classroom, smartly and safely, has to be the number one priority of politicians, public-health officials, educators and parents alike.

Bars, restaurants, hair salons, golf clubs and the like should all take a back seat to ensuring that children get an education – and a childhood – pandemic or not.

Coronavirus information
Coronavirus information
The Zero Canada Project provides resources to help you manage your health, your finances and your family life as Canada reopens.
Visit the hub

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies