Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has vowed to get more aggressive in reducing emissions. How far, and how fast, he intends to go remains to be seen.

DARRYL DYCK/The Canadian Press

It didn’t take long for federal Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole to follow Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in visiting the centre of Western grievance in Canada – Alberta.

One day, in fact.

While Mr. Trudeau used his stop last week in Calgary to announce federal funding support for a long-delayed rapid-transit line, Mr. O’Toole went in a different direction the next day. He said if his party forms government in the next election, he will revamp the country’s fiscal-stabilization program as an initial step in ending what he termed “the mistreatment of Western Canadians.”

Story continues below advertisement

Under his plan, Alberta would get about $4-billion in rebates from Ottawa, with $1-billion to be divided among the rest of the provinces.

It would no doubt be a popular promise in a province the Conservatives need to once again own if they have any hope of forming government the next time a national vote takes place. Right now, polls show the federal Conservatives with a lead in Alberta, but not an overwhelming one.

It would appear the Conservatives are intent on clinging to the notion that Canada’s four Western provinces are in lockstep in their ire toward Ottawa. This is likely to be a source of debate during any election campaign.

Mr. Trudeau certainly indicated that in an interview I did with him in Vancouver on Friday, saying that treating Western Canada as a “monolithic block” is absurd and doesn’t recognize the range of opinion that exists from Manitoba to B.C.

Likewise, the Prime Minister rejected Mr. O’Toole’s assertion that we are in the midst of a “national-unity crisis.”

“I understand there is a constituency out there that is filled with anger toward Ottawa and the rest of Canada,” Mr. Trudeau said. “And there is no question Albertans have had a very, very difficult few years and there are many who are feeling hurt and angry, and a lot of them have felt that way toward the federal government for a long time.”

True. And there is a market for the kind of divisive, angry rhetoric that feeds those resentments. Although there are also a lot of Canadians who, as we emerge from this pandemic, might feel as if the country is more unified than it’s been in some time. They have seen their neighbours make extraordinary sacrifices, many on the front lines in the fight against COVID-19.

Story continues below advertisement

And as more and more of us feel real freedom for the first time in months, it’s arguable whether a campaign rooted in the notion that those in the West are only united in their red-hot bitterness toward Ottawa is the right call.

But if there are any gains to be had from such a strategy, they are likely to be enjoyed by the Conservatives.

However, some of the Conservatives most reliable talking points, in the Prairie provinces at least, are going to be harder to campaign on in the next election. The debate around the carbon tax, for instance, seems to be finished. There wasn’t the backlash the Conservatives were hoping for in the wake of the Liberals’ pledge to introduce a carbon levy that will eventually reach $170 a tonne by 2030.

Also, record temperatures this summer have only given climate activists, and just plain old citizens everywhere, more ammunition in their call for governments to get more aggressive in reducing emissions.

Mr. Trudeau has vowed to do just that. How far, and how fast, he intends to go remains to be seen.

The Conservatives need to be careful that they don’t once again look like climate-denying dinosaurs, when it comes to their environmental platform, in a bid to curry favour with like-minded voters in some of the Western provinces. Fighting for more pipelines, for instance, seems drastically out of step with the times.

Story continues below advertisement

I think Mr. O’Toole also needs to be mindful of overplaying his hand, of using words such as “mistreatment” to characterize people who have not been wronged or victimized in the way Indigenous peoples have, or in the way, say, many Muslims and other minorities in this country have.

Forcing people to pay a carbon tax in an effort to stop the planet from burning up is hardly mistreatment.

Mostly, however, Mr. O’Toole and others need to stop talking about “Western alienation.” The “West” in this country does not have groupthink when it comes to the policies of the current federal government in Ottawa.

There is the same diversity of opinion that exists right across this country. And the sooner our politicians recognize this the better.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies