Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Justin Trudeau attends a press conference announcing Julie Payette's appointment as Canada's next governor-general on Parliament Hill on July 13, 2017.

Chris Wattie/Reuters

Mike Van Soelen is a crisis communications expert at Toronto public-affairs firm Navigator.

Justin Trudeau is in a pickle.

With the crisis around Governor-General Julie Payette’s workplace behaviour and resignation, the Prime Minister has painted himself into a tough corner.

Story continues below advertisement

Some of the trickiest scandals to shake are those that seem to confirm perceptions of the central actor. People find these crises easy to believe. It doesn’t take a lot of mental gymnastics for the average person to agree that big corporations are money-sucking evil entities – look no further than “Pharma Bro” Martin Shkreli. Or that government leaders too often take a “do as I say, not as I do” approach – look no further than former Ontario finance minister Rod Phillips. And while few feel any sympathy for former president Donald Trump, because the accusation he must be in the pocket of the Russians felt to most particularly believable, he was subjected to a two-year investigation led by Robert Mueller and countless accusations from political rivals, all based on little direct evidence.

Mr. Trudeau has a similar credibility crisis. His critics, and maybe even some of his fans, believe he’s unserious, celebrity-obsessed and exhibits poor judgment. They point to Mr. Trudeau’s bhangra dancing in India, photoshoot in Vogue and holidaying with the Aga Khan as ample evidence for their opinions.

On Friday, Mr. Trudeau addressed the governor-general fiasco for the first time by trying to deflect and avoid personal responsibility. He attempted to defend the decision to appoint Ms. Payette in the first place, while allowing that his government would “strengthen and improve” the vetting process going forward.

In other words, pretty standard issues-management tactics – drone on about process and hope the story doesn’t have enough oxygen to stick around.

It could work. While critics are expressing breathless reverence for the importance of our viceregal, it’s not clear how much the general public will really care about the governor-general’s centrality in the functioning of our Westminster Parliament.

The Trudeau government must now try to calculate how much life the story has.

The parliamentary media gallery loves a scandal, and it’s fair to estimate they will continue to pursue this one. It’s tantalizing enough; Ms. Payette throwing the “we all experience things differently” bon mot into her resignation letter is pure gold. There are many relatable elements, such as Ms. Payette’s rich government pension, that could keep the press gallery, talk radio and social media warriors interested in the story for some time yet.

Story continues below advertisement

I expect there were issues managers running around Ottawa this weekend, hoping to figure out a plan to change the channel. Seldom is there a crisis-communications meeting where someone doesn’t suggest as much. But the ability of those who are the focus of a crisis to diffuse it with manufactured distraction is highly overestimated. If the public isn’t ready to move on, the government’s efforts will be futile. The public will say, “Sure, it’s nice you were the first foreign leader President Joe Biden called, but about that governor-general screw up …”

So what can the Prime Minister do?

Some have asked me if Mr. Trudeau should just apologize. Apologies are tricky. In real life, we offer apologies to earn forgiveness. For most people in a crisis, there is no forgiveness on offer. The calculus is transactional; his team will be considering whether an apology from Mr. Trudeau, if he owns up to his culpability, would make the public and the media willing to move on.

The apology may help the government get past this episode, but only by having its leader agree to take the blame. The worst-case scenario is the PM apologizes, accepts a measure of guilt, and the public doesn’t move on. Recent celebrity scandals are chock-full of apologies that didn’t solve the crisis in terms of changing perceptions but did help get them off the front pages, as the public feels satisfied to have extracted its pound of flesh. Case in point: This year, former Glee star Lea Michele apologized for her horrid workplace behaviour; while the public moved on, I’d guess most people still believe she is a terrible person to work with.

The most effective solution would be for the government to put forward a nominee for governor-general who is universally loved, one whom the opposition would feel compelled to endorse. With that, the outrage about Ms. Payette may dissipate.

For now, it seems the Trudeau government will try to ride this one out, in the hopes that some other event overtakes it. Maybe the calculation will pay off. But the reality is when you paint yourself into a corner, it often takes a number of sticky steps to get out.

Story continues below advertisement

The resignation of Governor-General Julie Payette leaves a vacuum with a possible election on the horizon. John Ibbitson says Ms. Payette's reported behaviour meant she had to go, and now Prime Minister Trudeau has to restore confidence in the vice-regal role with his next choice of governor-general. The Globe and Mail

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies