Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }
Coronavirus information
Coronavirus information
The Zero Canada Project provides resources to help you make the most of staying home.
Visit the hub

Frank Ching is a Hong Kong-based journalist.

China’s decision to lock down the central city of Wuhan – with more people than London or New York – in a dramatic attempt to halt the spread of the deadly coronavirus shocked even the World Health Organization, whose representative said a move to “contain a city of 11 million people is new to science.”

Other decisive acts followed and, by Sunday, more than 56 million people in Hubei province (where Wuhan is the capital) were quarantined, with many other cities taking their own steps to isolate the virus.

Story continues below advertisement

While such actions show determination, they may have come too late. President Xi Jinping himself acknowledged this, saying on Saturday, the first day of the year of the rat, that the spread of the deadly new virus was “accelerating.”

If actions were taken weeks earlier, the virus could conceivably have been contained. But, just four days after the Wuhan lockdown, the number of cases had risen to nearly 3,000 from 571 and the number of deaths had more than soared, to 100 from 17. Now, every province in the country has been infected except Tibet.

Internationally, those affected include not only neighbours such as Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan, but also Australia, the United States, Canada and Europe – not to mention Hong Kong and Macau.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the WHO, said last Thursday, “Make no mistake, this is an emergency in China, but it has not yet become a global health emergency. It may yet become one.” Its risk assessment at the time was very high in China, high at the regional level, and high at the global level.

This is China’s first major health crisis since the SARS epidemic of 2002-03, when Chinese officials covered up the extent and severity of the disease, which also started in China before spreading overseas, sickening more than 8,000 people worldwide, with nearly 800 fatalities.

Much progress has been made by China since then. This time around, Chinese scientists were able to come up with the genome sequence of the new coronavirus and share that information with the world body.

China is also much more open this time around, certainly since Mr. Xi became personally involved on Jan. 20, when he called for effective measures to contain the disease, saying that people’s health should be treated as a top priority.

Story continues below advertisement

The problem is that the Communist Party, of which Mr. Xi is the leader, has other top priorities, in particular political stability, and anything seen as undermining stability is suppressed.

January was an especially sensitive month for Wuhan, with the city set to play host to major provincial meetings of the National People’s Congress and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference from Jan. 12 to 17. Not surprisingly, provincial and municipal leaders did not welcome publicity of an epidemic.

In the first week of January, police detained eight people for “spreading rumours” online and harming social stability by saying there was an epidemic. Reporters were forbidden to write about the new disease and journalists who criticized officials for suppressing information were victimized.

One telling case was that of reporter Zhang Ouya of the Hubei Daily, the official provincial party newspaper. Mr. Zhang, the day after the lockdown order, called on the Weibo social-media platform for a leadership change in the city. The situation, he said, is steadily deteriorating and, for the sake of Wuhan, “I hope that the leader is changed immediately.”

Within hours, he was denounced by his newspaper, which issued an abject apology to the party committee. The Hubei Daily promised to punish Mr. Zhang “according to disciplinary rules” and “prevent anything like this from ever happening again.”

This new coronavirus crisis, like SARS, underlines a systemic problem within China. The problem is that the priority attached to stability means that the state seeks to control all information.

Story continues below advertisement

When an issue arises, it seems, the system’s obsession with controlling information isn’t flexible enough to prevent a crisis from developing, especially when lower level officials fear for their career if they report truthfully on the situation to central government leaders.

The solution is to be found in greater transparency. Officials should also be encouraged to speak their minds rather than fear being reprimanded for speaking truth to power. This has much to do with the man at the top, who sets the pace. He must be confident enough in himself and in his subordinates to encourage them to say what they really think, rather than say what they think he wants to hear.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

In the interests of public health and safety, our coronavirus news articles are free for anyone to access. However, The Globe depends on subscription revenue to support our journalism. If you are able, please subscribe to globeandmail.com. If you are already a subscriber, thank you for your support.

Your subscription helps The Globe and Mail provide readers with critical news at a critical time. Thank you for your continued support. We also hope you will share important coronavirus news articles with your friends and family. In the interest of public health and safety, all our coronavirus news articles are free for anyone to access.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies