Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Thomas Gunton is director of the Resource and Environmental Planning Program at Simon Fraser University and is a former deputy minister of environment in B.C., where he worked on resolving war-in-the-woods conflicts.

Not surprisingly, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has reapproved the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion (TMX) as part of his promise to achieve a balance between the environment and economy.

While governments should be applauded for seeking consensus in an increasingly polarized world, the Prime Minister’s efforts seem to have failed, as pro-environment stakeholders attack the Liberals for contributing to climate change and risking B.C.’s coast, while pro-development forces attack the government’s carbon tax despite its approval of TMX.

Story continues below advertisement

One conclusion from this failure is that seeking consensus is futile and governments are better off picking sides. Although this is an increasingly popular strategy, it is counterproductive because the resulting conflicts from polarized policies are damaging to everyone’s interests.

The debate over the TMX pipeline is a case in point. Advocates argue that we need more pipelines to carry Canadian oil to world markets to avoid discounted prices and buoy the Canadian economy. Opponents argue that tanker traffic from TMX would pose a high risk to B.C.’s coast, with a 75-per-cent likelihood of a tanker spill, and that TMX will contribute to climate change.

Opponents also point out that the National Energy Board review is flawed because it relied on economic information from 2015 that is no longer relevant. For example, other major pipelines have been approved since 2015, and the costs of TMX have almost doubled, making it a much less desirable project.

Although both sides of the TMX debate have valid arguments, the government sided with the proponents. This move will result in more delays as the decision is challenged on the grounds that consultation with First Nations was rushed to meet an artificial deadline. This will be accompanied by the inevitable protests to block construction.

The government may ultimately conclude that these political risks combined with the economic risks of higher construction costs, more competition from other pipelines and weaker oil markets may make TMX not worth building. It would be imprudent for the government to ignore these risks.

Instead of fanning conflict by picking a side, the government could have sought more creative options that come closer to meeting the interests of both sides.

One option that the government could have considered is reconfiguring TMX to use its existing spur line to increase shipments to oil refineries in Washington state. Alberta would earn world prices for its oil and, as one recent study confirms, all tanker traffic in the Salish Sea could be eliminated as Alberta pipeline shipments replace Alaskan tanker oil imports.

Story continues below advertisement

Alternatively, the government could promote other new pipeline options such as Enbridge’s expansions and Keystone XL, which will add more than 1.6 million barrels a day of capacity, which is more than enough to meet even the most optimistic oil production forecasts to 2035. These pipelines also connect to world-priced tidewater locations in the U.S. Gulf and, unlike TMX, they do not require any taxpayer money to build and involve no tanker traffic.

Another part of a compromise would be for Canada to implement a climate-change plan that shows explicitly how we are going to meet our Paris climate commitments – and how much oil production is consistent with this objective. Canada’s current plan does not demonstrate how we will meet our targets and, if it is revised to do so, it will likely confirm International Energy Agency projections that meeting Paris targets will result in a decline in oil production and a decline in the need for pipelines.

A third part of a compromise solution is to work with Alberta and the oil industry to increase the refining of oil to generate more value and more jobs than Alberta gets by exporting raw bitumen.

Admittedly, seeking a more creative compromise that generates more jobs by expanding pipelines and investing in refining, while reducing tanker traffic and greenhouse gas emissions, is challenging and may not be possible in the current polarized environment.

But as B.C. discovered in its war in the woods, it is possible to find creative solutions that reduce conflict by meeting the interests of opposing sides, leaving everyone better off.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies