Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen and CSBC Corporation Chairman Cheng Wen-Lon arrive at the launch ceremony for the Taiwan Navy's domestically built amphibious transport dock Yushan in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, on April 13, 2021.

ANN WANG/Reuters

If the Trudeau government truly believes in the principles of democracy and a rules-based international order, then it needs to start talking seriously with other stable democracies about formally recognizing Taiwan as the successful independent country it has become.

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the decision by the United Nations General Assembly to expel the Republic of China, which had governed a broadly liberal-democratic China until its overthrow in 1949 by Mao Zedong’s People’s Liberation Army forced its government into exile on the islands of Taiwan.

As a result of that 1971 vote, the UN, and soon most member countries, stopped recognizing Taiwan as the legitimate government of China and instead gave Mao’s People’s Republic of China a permanent seat on the five-country Security Council as well as the General Assembly. That decision launched a broader international tradition of leaving the status of Taiwan deliberately ambiguous.

Story continues below advertisement

Fifty years later, both Taipei and Beijing are very different places.

No longer is Taiwan a military garrison claiming control of all of China. In 1992, it formally abandoned that claim and its government is committed to making Taiwan an independent country, distinct from China. Since 1996, Taiwan has been a full-fledged multiparty democracy, and successfully so.

Its current President, Tsai Ing-wen, has distinguished herself not only for being an opposition leader who made a respectful transition to elected power, but also for having managed the COVID-19 pandemic more successfully than virtually any other country. Taiwan’s 24 million people have experienced only 11 deaths, without significant restrictions on freedoms, and its vaccination campaign has been a success.

Beijing has gone in another direction. Under Xi Jinping’s leadership, it has abandoned its noncommittal stance toward Taiwan and repeatedly threatened to seize control of the island and impose the “one country” restrictions Hong Kong has been forced to accept.

When U.S. President Joe Biden took office in January, Beijing sent fighter jets across the Taiwan Strait, and Chinese Defence Ministry spokesman Wu Qian declared that “Taiwan independence means war.” Mr. Biden has, in turn, sent signals of support to Taiwan that one analysis called “surprisingly forceful.” This week, a delegation of Mr. Biden’s confidants made a visit to the island to talk with leaders, a move that drew angry rebukes from Beijing and more fighter jets across the Strait.

There’s a growing consensus in the U.S. and other Western countries around recognizing and supporting Taiwan, breaking Washington’s official posture since 1979 of “strategic ambiguity.”

Some, however, are supporting the idea for the wrong reasons. One increasingly popular school of thought among U.S. analysts and policymakers holds that recognition of Taiwan should be a strategic response to rising Chinese militancy. This unilateral approach not only raises the danger of an outright war across the Strait or even the Pacific, but it does Taiwan no favours by turning it into a pawn in a superpower struggle.

Story continues below advertisement

Canada needs to have a clear position on Taiwan’s sovereignty. A news report this week suggested that Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan had threatened to cut off funding to the annual Halifax Security Forum if it gave an award to Ms. Tsai, out of fear of angering Beijing. He denied this, but did not sound enthusiastic about the award.

Far from being cautious to the point of acquiescence, Canada should be leading a push toward recognizing Taiwan for the right reasons: Not as a gambit in a geopolitical struggle, but because Taiwan has earned its place among the community of successful pluralist liberal democracies, in part by smartly managing relations with Beijing. Taiwan is the kind of country we should strive to be.

Taiwan is also important because its success utterly disproves the fictions propagated both by Beijing and by Western reactionaries about Chinese culture being intrinsically authoritarian and deferential. Taiwanese life is an illustration of Confucianism’s democratic roots – a future China could have.

In planning a path to a sovereign Taiwan, we need to keep two things in mind.

First, this can only be done once, and will have consequences, so the timing and messaging need to be right. Recognition of Taiwan should not appear to be a response to anything done by China, or Taipei would effectively be turned into a projectile. Taiwan deserves independence for its own, intrinsic, reasons.

Second, if it is to succeed without repercussions, it needs to be done as a truly co-ordinated act by a majority of nations, including some unlikely ones not normally allied with the United States. This will involve a major campaign of arm-twisting and incentives.

Story continues below advertisement

It would help if a country like Canada took a leading role in such a campaign – both because Taiwan deserves it, and because it would finally align our actions to our professed principles.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies