Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The Jody Wilson-Raybould affair had been fast fading from public consciousness as Canadians embarked on the barbecue season. And the tide had begun to turn for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberals, allowing them to reasonably contemplate their re-election.

Of course, victory was hardly in the bag. The Liberals were still miles behind the Conservatives in terms of campaign preparedness. And Mr. Trudeau seemed less sure-footed than he had before the February departure of his alter-ego and former principal secretary Gerald Butts.

Mr. Butts left in the wake of Ms. Wilson-Raybould’s revelations that senior staff in the Prime Minister’s Office put pressure on her as justice minister and attorney-general to overturn a decision by the director of public prosecutions on SNC-Lavalin, throwing the Liberals off their re-election game plan. The intervening months have exposed the hole left by Mr. Butts’s absence from the PMO.

Story continues below advertisement

So it was no surprise to see Mr. Butts return to the fold in time for the campaign. He doesn’t need an official title to be the de facto ring master of the Liberals’ re-election effort. His mere presence within Mr. Trudeau’s orbit will reassure the Prime Minister and keep him on message as the Liberals seek to define the ballot question and demonize the Tories.

Mr. Trudeau runs several risks in bringing Mr. Butts back for the campaign – from demoralizing Liberal backbenchers who had grown frustrated by the former principal secretary’s gatekeeper role to reviving a perception among many voters that Mr. Trudeau is not his own man. But Mr. Trudeau evidently feels he needs Mr. Butts more than the other way around.

Just last week, Mr. Trudeau twice got out over his skis. In saying that comments akin to Donald Trump’s ugly attack on four progressive congresswomen “should not be allowed” in Canada, Mr. Trudeau went too far, turning what should have been a fairly straightforward condemnation of the U.S. President’s remarks into a eyebrow-raising call to limit free speech.

Opinion: Gerald Butts is the modern day Rainmaker, and the only one Trudeau trusts this election

Opinion: Butts is back. Now the question is whether he can renew Trudeau, too

Gerald Butts returning to take on important role in Liberal re-election campaign, party official says

Then, in telling Canadians to be “patient” as Indigenous communities “make their own mistakes” on the road to reconciliation, Mr. Trudeau told a Liberal fundraiser in Victoria: “We have to be unconditional in our support in a way a parent needs to be unconditional in their love – not that there is a parent-child dynamic here.” He’s just lucky he had a friendly audience.

It might seem that Mr. Trudeau can hardly lose against a Conservative Leader who thinks chocolate milk is a miracle food, as Andrew Scheer intimated last week. Mr. Scheer’s vow to force a review of the recently updated Canada Food Guide – decried by the same dairy farmers who helped him win the Conservative leadership – was a political stunt. If Mr. Scheer is willing to interfere in Health Canada’s determinations about what’s best for Canadians’ well-being, then there’s no telling what other independent government agencies he’s willing to politicize.

With Mr. Scheer’s willingness to feed into negative narratives about the Conservatives, the Liberals hardly need Mr. Butts to do it for them. But by bringing him back for the campaign, if not longer, Mr. Trudeau seeks to ensure he is disciplined and steeled for battle.

Already, in a May interview with The Huffington Post, the supposedly retired-from-politics Mr. Butts was offering campaign advice to his former boss. “The campaign should be about a choice, not a referendum” on the Liberal record. The Liberals are “just getting started” on their “agenda to make the economy fairer and to make growth work for everybody.”

Story continues below advertisement

He added this kicker: “The starkest choice is on the climate, and what kind of economy people think is going to attract new investment and jobs, and what kind of jobs do people think their kids are going to have.” In other words, get ready for a characterization of Conservative politicians and policies as reactionary and dangerous for your children’s future.

Framing the decision facing voters as a “stark choice” between the forces of light and dark may not be a novel campaign tactic, but Liberals seem settled on going all out in their efforts to depict the Conservatives as scary. If they continue in the vein of recent Liberal characterizations of Conservative positions on conversion therapy, immigration and women’s rights, Canadians could be in for one of the most divisive election campaigns yet.

After all, the sunny ways no longer work their magic. Because it’s 2019, and Mr. Trudeau and the Liberals have a record to account for, Mr. Butts is turning to Plan B.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies