Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Ken Boessenkool is a public-policy economist with a long history in Canadian politics.

The biggest economic policy challenge we face during COVID-19 is addressing the massive and widespread loss of work prompted by government-mandated physical distancing. That’s not to minimize other such challenges, but the loss of work is vast and unprecedented.

To its credit, the federal government’s three-pronged response has not been tepid. First, the existing Employment Insurance (EI) program catches a portion of those who lose their jobs. Second, a new Canadian Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) that works through our tax system is intended take care of the 45 per cent of Canadians who who lose their jobs and don’t qualify for EI. Third, the government will institute a 75-per-cent wage subsidy to be paid to small- and medium-sized businesses to encourage those firms to retain their employees.

Story continues below advertisement

But there are three major reasons why proactively sending a direct deposit or cheque to the 28.5 million Canadians who filed income taxes last year – a Crisis Basic Income, as I have proposed in these pages and elsewhere – remains a more effective and efficient plan.

The first is administrative. While I pray they succeed – and I continue to cheer on our civil service, as well as our health professionals – administration of the three-pronged response will stretch our physically isolated public service to the breaking point. All three programs are application-based and will require some level of human oversight. Nearly 1 million EI applications were filed between Mar. 16 and Mar. 22. The government has said that it is expecting 4 million CERB applications. There are more than a million businesses with fewer than 100 employees in Canada.

Jennifer Robson, an associate professor of political management in the faculty of public affairs at Carleton University, has raised flags about the cheques-to-everyone approach, including errors in the Canada Revenue data set because people move or change their personal situation; lags in sending cheques; and gaps for those who don’t file. But I believe an automatic Crisis Basic Income will lead to fewer errors, lags and gaps than processing and verifying 6 million applications across three programs – two of them new.

Second, the Crisis Basic Income can function as an indirect wage subsidy for firms. Automatic payments represent a decentralized approach – firms could reduce pay or hours by some or all of the $2,000 for each employee on payroll – versus the top-down centralized administration envisioned by the current wage subsidy.

Third is the big one: undershooting gaps. There are 30.5 million Canadians over the age of 15, and 20.0 million Canadians in the labour force (working or looking for work) in February. A Crisis Basic Income a) would cover the vast majority of Canadians who are working, b) is automatic rather than application-based, and, c), payments can be added to income and taxed, or clawed back directly when Canadians file their taxes next year. In short, the broad Crisis Basic Income approach overshoots today and reconciles later, while the three-pronged plan creates potential gaps for those who don’t neatly fit any of the proposed programs neatly.

Our local auto-repair shop has reduced operations to two days a week. Their employees are working, so won’t qualify for EI or CERB. And the wage subsidy would only cover two days of wages, not five. Neither program appears to fill the gap between two and five days of work. A Crisis Basic Income would.

Or look at self-employed freelancers, many of whom haven’t set up a Canadian Controlled Commercial Corporation and operate without a GST/HST number, both of which measures are required for the current wage subsidy. They won’t qualify for a wage subsidy or the CERB if they keep working or if they work less. But they would get a Crisis Basic Income cheque.

Story continues below advertisement

Or consider a retailer split between franchised and corporate stores. Detailed wage subsidy rules are not yet available, but the government has said the subsidy will be based on a drop in sales of at least 30 per cent. Will this be calculated by store? By region? By company? We could end up with Kim’s boss at a franchised store getting a wage subsidy, while Chris’s boss at a corporate store down the street does not. They would both get Crisis Basic Income.

We simply do not know how deep and wide the current economic dislocation will be. We cannot forecast with accuracy which particular groups of Canadians will face an immediate economic loss – we only know it will be large. Canada therefore needs a policy that overshoots by design – a policy that is as universal as possible.

Undershooting means trying to figure out who needs help now. Overshooting means figuring out who needs help later.

In normal times we would, and should, do the former. But in a COVID-19 world, we can, and should, do the latter.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies