Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Erna Paris is the author of several books including Long Shadows: Truth, Lies and History and From Tolerance to Tyranny: A Cautionary Tale from Fifteenth-Century Spain

Last week, a Hamburg state court found Bruno Dey, 93, a former SS tower guard at the Stutthof concentration camp, guilty of complicity in 5,232 counts of murder: the exact number of human beings destroyed during his tenure there in 1944-45.

Because Mr. Dey was a boy of 17 when he took up his duties, he was tried in a juvenile court (where the sight of an elderly man in a wheelchair must have startled the staff). The prosecution sought a three-year prison sentence; the defence called for an acquittal on grounds that such a young person would have been incapable of standing up to his elders in the name of conscientious refusal. The judge, for her part, decided on a suspended sentence of two years. A symbolic punishment.

Story continues below advertisement

In the aftermath, the usual questions were raised. Why bother trying someone for a crime committed so long ago, even if the law allows it? Why prosecute a man of 93 whose life was drawing to a natural close? What choice did he have? He had made a public apology at the close of his trial. Shouldn’t that be enough? Finally, might a merely symbolic verdict actually diminish the appalling nature of his offence?

These important questions are asked at each trial of an elderly Nazi. How do we weigh accountability against our concern for contrite, often ill, old men?

In my view, the rights of the surviving victims and their descendants to see justice done are indisputably more pressing than the sentimental desire to forgive an elderly perpetrator. In the case of Bruno Dey, the individual circumstances were taken into account. For example, the judge may have considered his apology and age when pondering her judgment, but far from diminishing the horror of the crimes, her choice of a symbolic sentence effectively enhanced their importance by emphasizing that, even without jail time, the old must remain accountable.

As for having no choice, the historian Stefan Hoerdler testified that thousands of SS guards were granted transfers from camps to field service. Yet Mr. Dey chose to stay.

Beyond the lawyerly details of his trial, there was something peculiarly disturbing about Mr. Dey that resonates today. Although his watch tower was adjacent to the gas chamber – he admitted hearing the screams of the dying and seeing their bodies carted to the crematorium – he was a “passive spectator,” according to the judge, a person who experienced his job as “monotonous work.” It is one thing to rehearse the now-discredited argument that German gentiles had no idea what was happening to their Jewish neighbours, even when the former lived in apartment blocks that overlooked houses where victims were collected before being transferred to concentrations camps (a particular configuration I witnessed decades later while doing research in Berlin); but quite another to work without apparent interest in an environment where people being murdered scream under your nose. Mr. Dey, it seems, was not a convinced Nazi; he was simply indifferent. Remarkably, he claimed at the end of his trial not to have fully taken in what was happening in the camp. Listening to the survivors describe their desperate experience had opened his eyes, he explained. Now, he was truly sorry.

What’s disturbing about this incurious man is how successfully he normalized his unspeakable workplace. Astonishingly, he had lived out his life in postwar Germany, where the Holocaust has been at the heart of public discourse, and seemed to have maintained a willful blindness.

The Dey verdict sends an urgent message that we need to remember not just what happened, but how it happened, for we are at a tipping point historically. According to the German scholar Aleida Assmann, the collective memory of major events is about 70 to 80 years. That’s where we are now with regard to the rise of Hitler and the Holocaust. Second, Mr. Dey’s ability to normalize extraordinary events is merely an exaggeration of a tendency native to us all. That we can apparently get used to anything is historically evident. Frighteningly, it is something we are living right now as populist leaders veer toward fascism in Europe and the United States, where a president sends troops to overcome dissident citizens.

Story continues below advertisement

It’s incumbent upon us to pay attention. The clock is ticking; there will not be many more Bruno Deys in the dock to remind us that indifference can be as deadly as passion – and that justice matters, no matter how long it takes.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies