Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Mike Medeiros is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Amsterdam. Daniel Béland is the director of the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada. André Lecours is a professor of political studies at the University of Ottawa.

The COVID-19 crisis has been tremendously challenging for the provinces and the federal government. Canada’s federal system entails that this national public-health crisis has been managed through a variety of priorities, criteria and policies depending on the provincial jurisdiction.

The panoply of measures to deal with the pandemic can be confusing. In the spring, as Canada was still in the initial phase of the crisis, certain public-health experts, and federal politicians, proposed that the federal government invoke the Emergencies Act to allow for more consistent policies and measures across the country. In recent weeks, as the situation has worsened in most of the country, the calls for a uniform and stringent national approach have returned. Such new calls are motivated in part by provinces that have been hesitant to enact strict measures to combat the outbreaks. While we do not believe – unless the situation drastically changes – that the federal government will try to impose national measures any time soon, we are, as scholars of Canadian politics and of federalism, nevertheless concerned by the tenor of the continuing debate over having the federal government supersede provincial jurisdictions in the management of the COVID-19 crisis.

Story continues below advertisement

We believe that most public-health experts who have proposed uniform national measures have done so because they are concerned by the public-health situation. Yet, in the present context, important realities of Canada’s federal system need to be highlighted.

The fact that there are different strategies used across the country to combat the pandemic is not in itself problematic. This important characteristic of Canadian federalism allows for a more localized form of management that is better aligned with the needs of the different provinces than countrywide measures would be. Furthermore, the perceptions that one or two provinces are not being strict enough also does not constitute a situation that warrants the federal government undermining the federal character of the country.

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has stated, the usage of this significant step needs to be the last resort. The imposition of national measures by the federal government would need wide-ranging political support from Parliament and the provinces to prevent provoking a serious political crisis. As the invocation of the War Measures Act during the October Crisis and the National Energy Program demonstrate, superseding the provinces can leave important political fractures in the country that can last for decades and ultimately threaten national unity.

We believe that calls to have the federal government impose uniform national measures at this point, which implicitly depict the federal government as being above the provinces, pervert Canadians’ perceptions of their country and they ultimately weaken our federal culture. Canada is not a country in which the central government is hierarchically above the provinces. Rather, Canada is a country in which the federal government and provinces govern in partnership.

This does not mean that we cannot imagine an increased role for the federal government in the current COVID-19 crisis, or that pan-Canadian measures to tackle the pandemic are not welcome. This is specifically what the Premier of British Columbia, John Horgan, had called for on Nov. 18, requesting non-essential travel across Canada be limited.

A successful federal state is built upon co-operation and mutual respect. In Germany, this is the strategy that Chancellor Angela Merkel has used to deal with the divergent views of state premiers on which measures to enact to fight COVID-19. And for the most part, co-operation and respect have also been the hallmark of Canadian intergovernmental relations during the COVID-19 crisis.

We understand that some might be worried about the approach taken by their province to deal with the surge in cases and would want the federal government to impose stricter measures. Yet, this not only goes against the spirit and tradition of Canadian federalism, it could also create a dangerous and politically divisive precedent.

Story continues below advertisement

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies