Skip to main content

Robert Latimer may deserve some compassion. But he does not deserve a pardon for his crime.

On Oct. 24, 1993, Mr. Latimer sat his 12-year-old daughter Tracy in his truck, ran a hose from the exhaust pipe to the cab, started the engine and piped carbon monoxide into the vehicle until she died.

Tracy had cerebral palsy, a congenital condition that occurs when a baby suffers brain damage during birth.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Latimer said Tracy was in constant pain and that he killed her because he could not bear to watch her suffer anymore.

The Wilkie, Sask., farmer was charged with first-degree murder.

In 1994, Mr. Latimer was convicted of second-degree murder – which carries a minimum 10-year sentence.

What followed was a long legal saga, and a polarizing public debate.

An undated photo shows Robert Latimer and his daughter Tracy.

CP PHOTO/Maclean's/HO

The ruling was appealed, but upheld by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. But, in 1995, it was revealed that the RCMP, on Crown orders, had interfered with jury selection by questioning potential jurors about religion and mercy killing.

As a result, the Supreme Court granted Mr. Latimer a new trial.

In 1997, he was once again convicted of second-degree murder. The trial judge – encouraged to be lenient by the jury – imposed a two-year sentence. The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal overturned that sentence, saying the 10-year minimum-sentence rule must apply. That decision was upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

In 2001, Mr. Latimer went to prison, a minimum-security facility in Victoria.

In 2008, he was granted day parole (meaning he had to live in a halfway house), and in 2010, he was granted full parole.

Now, Mr. Latimer is asking for a pardon or, barring that, yet another trial.

Last week, his lawyer, Jason Gratl, petitioned Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybold, arguing that his client was a victim of a miscarriage of justice.

“A pardon would offer a glimpse of mercy, compassion and justice that the legal system and the medical system did not afford the Latimers,” Mr. Gratl wrote.

Mr. Latimer murdered his daughter.

Story continues below advertisement

One can argue that it was a mercy killing, or, as one judge called it, a “compassionate homicide.”

But Tracy never consented to her death, and that’s ultimately what makes this a crime – an unforgivable crime.

One can take issue with mandatory minimum sentences, but that does not mean Mr. Latimer deserves special dispensation.

The fact that Tracy Latimer was severely disabled does not justify her father’s actions. It makes them all the more appalling, because it suggests that her life was of lesser value.

Individuals with disabilities, their parents and caregivers live with many challenges – multiple surgeries, life-threatening infections, daily seizures, feeding tubes, colostomy bags, chronic pain, poverty, not to mention countless forms of daily discrimination and indignity.

People with severe disabilities may not have an ideal life, but, like everyone else, they deserve to live to their full potential.

Story continues below advertisement

In its ruling upholding Mr. Latimer’s sentence, the Supreme Court of Canada did something that is rarely done in this polarizing discussion – it humanized Tracy.

The justices noted that, just days before her death, the preteen had taken the bus to school, that she enjoyed music, bonfires, the circus and being gently rocked in her parents’ arms. They reminded us, too, that for a dozen years, her parents cared for her lovingly.

Sometimes, caring for someone who is ill or who has disabilities can be overwhelming; at times, it may feel desperately hopeless.

None of those emotions is a licence to kill.

How we treat the most vulnerable in society – in the health system, the justice system and elsewhere – is a litmus test for our compassion and humanity.

Mr. Latimer was treated fairly by the justice system – with kid gloves, even.

He served his time and deserves to get on with life, but that does not mean his record should be expunged or his actions forgiven.

Let’s not forget that Mr. Latimer has never said he was sorry; in fact, he admits he would do it all again.

“What I did was right,” he said in a 2017 interview with the Saskatoon Star-Phoenix.

Mr. Latimer has, in the 25 years since he killed his daughter, has always portrayed himself as a victim and a martyr. He continues to do so in his demand for a pardon.

The only person denied mercy, compassion and justice in this grim saga was Tracy Latimer, and granting a pardon to her unrepentant killer would only exacerbate that sad truth.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter