Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Since its introduction in Parliament a month ago, Bill C-10, “An Act to Amend the Broadcasting Act,” has attracted relatively little attention. This is extraordinary, as the bill represents one of the most radical expansions of state regulation in Canadian history.

In brief, the government proposes to regulate the internet, or at least that part of it that is expressed in audio and video form. Henceforth, not only would conventional “broadcast undertakings” be subject to the officious fantasies of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), but so would all “online undertakings” – streaming services such as Netflix and Spotify – so long as they have Canadian subscribers.

No, the bill does not appear to go as far as the January recommendations from the federal Broadcasting and Telecommunications Legislative Review Panel, or not yet: Measures such as a “link tax” forcing social media platforms such as Facebook to compensate news organizations for linking to their sites (yes, you read that right), have been put off for future legislation. But just how far the state’s regulatory tentacles will now extend will depend in large part on how the CRTC interprets its new powers – and the bill’s language gives plenty of room to worry.

Story continues below advertisement

While the government claims it would not empower the CRTC to regulate smaller services such as Britbox, social media sites such as YouTube, or online news content, the bill contains no specific provisions that would prohibit it – and includes provisions that seem to allow it. For example, while the bill exempts “programs that are uploaded to an online undertaking” by its users and “online undertakings whose broadcasting consists only of such programs,” it leaves the way open for the CRTC to regulate services that show both user-generated and curated content. Like YouTube.

Likewise, lots of streaming services offer news content alongside movies and other fare. And lots of text-based news organizations, such as The Globe and Mail, also stream audio and video. So a specific exemption for audiovisual news content would not be greatly reassuring, even if the bill contained one – which it doesn’t.

If that sounds paranoid, consider the weight the government puts on its assurances that online broadcasters would not have to be “licensed.” That’s true, as far as it goes. They would just be obliged to “register” with the CRTC, subject to certain “conditions of service,” enforced by “fines.”

What do those conditions add up to? The unregulated online services that today allow millions of Canadian viewers to escape the stultifying grip of the CRTC, and the impenetrable CanCon racket that is its primary raison d’être, will henceforth be absorbed into the same regulatory-industrial complex that has made conventional Canadian TV so unwatchable.

Not only will they be required to pay, either directly or via some compulsory industry fund, to make more Canadian programs, but they will be obliged to post certified Canadian content prominently on their sites – where it will be ignored every bit as fervently as it is now. You can lead a horse to culture, but you can’t make it watch.

The supposed rationale for all this is to “level the playing field” with conventional Canadian broadcasters, who are struggling mightily – poor dears – to support the production of Canadian content all by themselves. But as the University of Ottawa’s Michael Geist never tires of pointing out, every word of this is false. Far from a shortage, there’s a positive glut of CanCon (domestic film and television production is, or was pre-pandemic, at an all-time high), to which Netflix, in particular, is already among the largest contributors.

Neither is the playing field noticeably unlevel: Online broadcasters may not currently be subject to the CanCon regime’s byzantine regulations, but neither are they the beneficiaries of its many favours, from simultaneous substitution to production subsidies. Nor is anything stopping Canadians from watching CanCon if they so choose – certainly not the belatedly invented problem of “discoverability.” If Canadian viewers want it, the streaming services will give it to them.

Story continues below advertisement

That wasn’t always the case: In television’s early days, there were only a few stations, and those were financed by advertising, with its well-known bias toward the top-rated (read: American) shows. But that is no longer the world we are in. Pay TV abolished the need for advertising; the internet abolished spectrum scarcity.

It’s true that it makes no sense to have one set of regulations for conventional broadcasters and another for online. That ought to have meant getting rid of the existing regulatory order. Instead, the government is attempting to draw the entire internet into its ghastly embrace. Can it possibly imagine it will succeed?

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies