Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

President Joe Biden says he wasn’t hyperbolizing this week when he claimed that American democracy, given “the raw and sustained election subversion” by Republicans, was under its greatest threat since the Civil War.

Should he be believed? The moves in states across America to restrict voting and put in place other measures that allow for the manipulation of election results are alarming.

More cause for consternation came this month with the ideologically lopsided Supreme Court’s ruling that, in effect, says the vote suppression measures are within legal bounds. The verdict upheld voting limits in Arizona that a lower court had found discriminatory under the Voting Rights Act.

Story continues below advertisement

The decision weakened much of that act, civil rights experts say, thereby green-lighting the Republicans’ bid to re-engineer the election system. The Constitution gives individual states considerable power over national elections – the court has enhanced those powers.

To be noted is that in Canada, owing to Pierre Trudeau’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the kind of thing the Grand Old disgrace of a Party is doing is prohibited. Section 3 of the Charter prevents the federal or provincial governments from limiting Canadians’ right to vote. Other aspects of the Charter can be overridden via the notwithstanding clause, but not voting rights.

This doesn’t prevent abusive practices as happened in the 2011 election with robocalls and other vote-suppression tactics deployed by Stephen Harper’s Conservatives. But the legal protections exist – ones that the U.S. could sorely use now.

According to a recent count by the Brennan Center for Justice, 17 states have enacted 28 new restrictive laws. Since Republicans control both chambers in 30 of the state legislatures, including the swing states of Texas, Georgia and Arizona, there is ample potential for more.

In addition to restricting turnout, which is deemed politically advantageous for the party, Republicans are taking measures that put the vote-counting process at risk. They’re changing the rules so that their partisan poll workers can more easily dispute vote-counting.

As if that’s not enough, they’re also making changes that allow themselves more latitude to certify and possibly reject election results – just as Donald Trump urged his followers to do after his election defeat.

More grim news is the likelihood that Mr. Biden’s sweeping voting-rights bill, the For the People Act, is moribund owing to all-out opposition from the Republicans. A way around that opposition is to change the Senate filibuster rules. This would be difficult given the objections of a few Democrats. Moreover, Mr. Biden still displays a hesitancy to tamper with the filibuster. But given how he believes that voting rights – the cornerstone of American democracy – are under massive assault, shouldn’t he be prepared to go to extremes beyond the bully pulpit to try and stop it?

Story continues below advertisement

Texas Democrats are doing that. Dozens of them took a remarkable step, staging a fist-raising exodus from the Lone Star State legislature to protest Governor Greg Abbott’s bid to pass vote-restriction measures. They travelled to Washington to demand that Congress take action.

In his impassioned speech Tuesday, Mr. Biden asked his Republican counterparts, “Have you no shame?” Apparently not. Many of them profess – the disinformation epidemic rages on – to believe the big lie about the election being stolen. They argue that the campaigns in the states are legitimate efforts to fight potential voting fraud and ensure election integrity.

Democrats face charges of hypocrisy. Many of the states they control have measures on the books that make it more difficult to cast a ballot than in places such as Georgia, which Mr. Biden condemns for having passed a new restrictive voting law. One such Democratic state is Delaware, which Mr. Biden represented in the Senate for 36 years.

As with so many other things in the U.S., extreme partisanship has taken over the voting-rights debate. It was thought that the Jan. 6 mob attack on Capitol Hill, encouraged by Mr. Trump, would make Americans come to their senses over how their democracy was at the precipice. It didn’t. GOP lawmakers and their supporters have dug in.

All will come to a head in the midterm elections in the fall of 2022, when all hell could break loose over voter eligibility, vote-count confrontations, overturned verdicts, or all three.

To win, Republicans are convinced they have to disenfranchise minorities. Their very purpose is to see the current voting system undermined. Unless Mr. Biden overcomes prohibitive odds to pass legislation to – you might say – stop the steal, it will very likely happen.

Story continues below advertisement

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies