Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

A tree swallow, one of the threatened species. (File Photo).

CHUCK KIRMAN/Ventura County Star / AP

David M. Bird is an emeritus professor of wildlife biology at McGill University who has studied birds for five decades.

When I read the recent headlines that North America has lost nearly three billion birds over just the past five decades, I was not surprised. But I must admit it did depress me to a degree. That’s a lot of birds!

Before we lost the three billion, how many birds were there in North America? In 1963, Roger Tory Peterson, the godfather of North American bird-watching, estimated there to be between 12 to 20 billion at the beginning of that decade. Going with the conservative figure, that’s a quarter of our birds gone in just 50 years.

Story continues below advertisement

The loss of billions of birds on North American soil has happened before. To our everlasting shame, in the late 1800s, passenger pigeons, sometimes gathering in flocks of two billion birds, were wiped out to the very last bird by humans.

But the loss of these three billion birds over the past five decades is different. It’s happening to a wide suite of bird species, and for myriad reasons, some obvious and some more subtle. Of those three billion birds, the majority belong to 12 bird families and include songbirds such as warblers, finches, swallows and sparrows. Aerial and grassland insectivores, shorebirds and possibly seabirds are all in serious states of free fall and many of these birds were quite common only 50 years ago. Even the two most highly successful invasive species ever in North America, the European starling and the house sparrow, are declining today.

While the study, which was published in the prestigious journal Science, did not go into the reasons behind the decline, habitat loss and degradation must surely top the list. After all, can we really have almost eight billion humans inhabit the planet and expect not to have any major impact on the habitats of birds and other wildlife? Everywhere in the world, we are gobbling up the forests for building homes, turning grasslands into monocultural farmland useless for birds and eating up everything in the seas.

We banned the use of persistent organochlorine chemical pesticides – which stopped the eggshell-thinning that caused birds of prey to go almost extinct in the 1970s – but followed that act by creating, and then thankfully banning, even more poisonous pesticides such as the short-lasting organophosphates. Perhaps the most insidious human-designed chemical pesticides of all, though, are the neonicotinoids. They may not kill birds directly, but they are having devastating consequences for insects, a major food item for many birds. A major study, published earlier this year in the journal Biological Conservation, revealed more than 40 per cent of insect species are facing extinction. We cannot have birds without insects to feed them.

And then there’s climate change. Besides upsetting the delicate timing balance for migratory birds, they are killed by vicious storm systems, while rising sea levels and wildfires destroy their breeding, stop-over and wintering habitats.

And then there are the dangers closer to home. Not to pick on cat lovers, but most biologists today agree that pet cats kill more than a billion birds each year in North America. Glass windows on our houses and skyscrapers take out another hundred million annually.

So why should we even care about the birds? Besides contributing billions of dollars to our economy through the sheer love of watching and enjoying them, birds do a lot for humans. They eat pests, pollinate our plants and crops, disperse seeds; their eggs and meat feed us and their feathers keep us warm. They have even helped us win wars by teaching our military about flight, camouflage, sentry systems and acting as vital message carriers. Birds have saved human lives not just by serving as literal “canaries in coal mines” but also by warning us of environmental health hazards such as carcinogenic pesticides and industrial by-products.

Story continues below advertisement

But the situation is not hopeless. Our birds can rebound if we give them a chance. A single American robin, producing two broods of four young each year, and with all of them surviving to breed just as successfully, can leave almost 25 million descendants in a decade.

We must save natural bird habitats from the greedy fingers of progress. But there are some more immediate and simple things we can do on our own: try to consume local foods from sustainable sources, drink bird-friendly coffee, reduce the use of pesticides and other chemicals, substitute plastic bags and cups with reusable bags and drinking containers, control our pet cats and/or at least keep our next one indoors and find ways to reduce window collisions. Let’s not vote for politicians who weaken important bird-protection acts. Lastly, let’s find a way to give some time as a citizen scientist to organizations such as Bird Studies Canada – most of the data detailing the loss of the three billion birds came from volunteers.

We have always celebrated birds because of their intrinsic value. Who can deny that birds entertain us in so many ways with their beauty, their song and their flight? How many great writers, artists, filmmakers and even aviators and astronauts were inspired by these amazing creatures? In short, a world without birds will not just be a biologically diminished world but also an emotionally diminished one. And if we lose our birds, we will lose ourselves.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies