Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Pope Francis celebrates a mass to mark the feast of apostles Peter and Paul, patrons of Rome, on June 29 in St. Perter's Basilica at the Vatican.

FILIPPO MONTEFORTE/AFP/Getty Images

Michael Coren is an author who is ordained in the Anglican Church of Canada.

It may be considered a dead language, but Latin seems to be very much alive, and kicking rather aggressively, if the past week is any indication. On July 16, Pope Francis reversed one of his predecessor’s most significant policies by reintroducing (and increasing) strict restrictions on celebrating the Latin Mass – or, to be more precise, the revised Tridentine rite so beloved of traditionalists and conservatives. He argued that this version of the mass was causing division within the church and being exploited by critics of the Second Vatican Council.

Vatican II, as it’s more commonly known, introduced some long overdue reforms into the church in the 1960s and allowed for a new, more participatory and, some would claim, more historically accurate mass, in the vernacular. Latin wasn’t outlawed but became increasingly difficult to find.

Story continues below advertisement

When the new service was introduced it certainly surprised people, but opposition was limited and relatively brief. J.R.R. Tolkien, author of The Lord of the Rings, loudly responded in Latin to show his displeasure. Writer Evelyn Waugh even asked to be excused from mass – but Evelyn Waugh would do that, wouldn’t he?

The Latin Mass enjoyed a renaissance during the pontificate of John Paul II, even though he wasn’t a particular devotee. There are now parishes that celebrate in Latin all over the world. Most also offer the service in the local language – but not always willingly or enthusiastically.

Is belief still relevant in these modern times?

Under Pope Francis’s new policy, the old rite has to receive the approval of the bishop in each diocese, and newly ordained priests require permission to lead such services, with the Vatican also being consulted. The bishop must also ascertain if Latin Mass leaders and participants accept Vatican II, which will be extremely difficult to do, and there is ambiguity about where they may worship – whether they will be allowed to do so in churches.

It is, frankly, a bit of a mess. It’s also extraordinary that Francis would have done this while his predecessor Benedict is still living, and many see it as an unprecedented insult. In Britain’s The Spectator, the highly regarded Tim Stanley immediately wrote an article under the headline “The Pope’s merciless war against the Old Rite.” He stated, “Why does this matter for Catholics and non-Catholics alike? Because it’s a lesson in how liberalism in this gerontocratic, Brezhnev-esque stage behaves – utterly intolerant of anyone who breaks from the party line. It is not enough to be quiet or even submit. You must conform.”

Actually, it doesn’t really matter to non-Catholics at all, nor to the vast majority of Catholics either. But the reaction exposes how sensitive conservative Catholics have become around this issue. The influential Rorate Caeli blog went a little further: “Francis HATES US. Francis HATES Tradition. Francis HATES all that is good and beautiful.” A Canadian blog screamed of Francis, “You are evil, perfectly possessed and a filthy hypocrite. Your time is short, Bergoglio and the gates of Hell are open-wide.”

That conservatism, often hysterical and bizarre, is the key to all this. No doubt there can be a certain beauty in the Latin ceremony, but if it were all about aesthetics it would hardly matter. While not all Latin Mass worshippers are right-wing, an entire culture has developed around the old rite, layered with atavistic values and aspirations that are directly contrary to the progressive ethos and policies of Francis and many senior clerics. Spend time on any traditionalist message board or website and you’ll be shocked.

Hyperbole and anger aside, the pious paradox here is that the very people who most loudly proclaim papal authority when rejecting progressive Catholics arguing for the ordination of women or the acceptance of same-sex marriage now condemn that same authority and dismiss the Pope as a heretic.

Story continues below advertisement

Jesus, of course, spoke Aramaic. The people who crucified him spoke Latin. Or Greek, the language of the Eastern Empire, of educated Romans, and of the earliest Christian services. Church Latin was introduced relatively late, and the Latin Mass people are so determined to defend developed many centuries after that.

It’s perhaps illustrative of the contemporary crisis of the church that while the Pope continues to refuse to address the deep involvement of his church in the residential schools horror with any depth of contrition or authentic ownership, he gallops forth on a subject like this, and people react with such ferocity. Fiddling while Rome burns? Mea culpa.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies