Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }
Coronavirus information
Coronavirus information
The Zero Canada Project provides resources to help you make the most of staying home.
Visit the hub

Scott Reid is a political analyst and principal at Feschuk.Reid and served as director of communications to prime minister Paul Martin.

In October 1962, with the United States and Soviet Union on the brink of nuclear conflict, Ted Sorensen was asked by President John F. Kennedy to write a letter.

It was to contain the White House’s reply to Premier Nikita Khrushchev, warning of severe military action if Soviet missiles were not removed immediately from Cuba. Mr. Sorensen, Kennedy’s political aide and trusted speechwriter, found himself at a loss for words for the first time in his life. He struggled with the implications of the hard line message he had been charged with composing.

Story continues below advertisement

Unsettled, he returned to the President’s generals to challenge their instruction, and Kennedy took heed. Mr. Sorensen’s instincts forced a rethink by both the hawks and the doves, paving the way for a historic diplomatic approach – and quite possibly averting an all-out nuclear war.

That’s pretty good staff work.

The crisis that confronts us today is of a different sort. Cold War tensions have been replaced by the hot fever of pandemic, but political advisers remain no less vital to successful government action than they were in the days of Mr. Sorensen and Mr. Kennedy.

This fact might be easily overlooked. In the estimation of many, political aides are the grubby filter between our elected leaders and apolitical public servants. What possible function, it might be wondered, could these glorified bag-carriers provide when the shady arts of politics are not required? Surely, at a time like this, we need good policy, not partisan advisers.

But then we’re reminded that Ted Sorensen was no military commander or diplomat. What he brought to the table was a nimble mind, a fine-tuned appreciation for public sentiment and the unqualified trust of the President. Those qualities enabled him to challenge the professionals, force the manufacture of additional options and, ultimately, help fashion a far superior outcome.

It is not so different for aides working today on our government’s response to COVID-19. Political staff may lack lifelong training in public health or emergency economic relief, but skilled aides will know how to read the public’s mood and can help their bosses build support for needed policies.

Like Mr. Sorensen, the best political aides are generalists with a talent for temporary specialization. Their versatility and range are assets needed by governments in a crisis such as this, when policies previously unimagined must be created from whole cloth and with record haste.

Story continues below advertisement

Take the federal economic response. Officials at the Department of Finance have an unmatched capacity to forecast effects on employment and economic growth. But they may also posses a natural, institutional bias to build programs that guard against abuse and preserve, rather than consume, fiscal capacity. It’s in their departmental DNA. This helps to explain why Canada’s initial policy response was so narrow and overcomplicated. Within a week, initial proposals were scrapped and substitutes were inserted. Even then, on-the-fly adjustments were further required to simplify and expedite help.

Here is an area where political aides can (and almost certainly did) force change for the better. The Department of Finance did not set out to provide an inadequate policy response. But the combination of an unprecedented challenge and long-learned habits produced a result that fell far short of what was required. The intervention of political advisers – attuned to where public needs are now and where they are likely headed soon – forces considerations that might not arise naturally from bureaucrats who are less exposed to direct popular feedback.

In usual times, the risk is that government initiatives might be sloppy or too permissive – bypassing those who need help the most and rewarding those who do not. This teaches policy-makers to be cautious and incremental, resisting political staff who might urge more expansive or hasty action. But in times of crisis, this dynamic is reversed. To help those in need, governments must respond creatively, quickly and with scale, even if that invites some sloppiness. Political staff are therefore needed to nudge policy-makers beyond their usual place of comfort and to produce more inventive options.

Plainly, these are far from usual times. Every indication is that we will remain in crisis mode for months to come. Consequently, the unique sensibilities of political advisers will be particularly needed – working productively in the cramped but critical space between professional public servants and elected leaders.

Of course, this demands that those aides be skilled – armed with the horsepower to intelligently question policy options and the judgment to resist political or partisan excess. Let’s trust that our leaders have picked their people well.

Because in times like ours, everyone values a JFK. But the world also needs its fair share of Ted Sorensens.

Story continues below advertisement

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

In the interests of public health and safety, our coronavirus news articles are free for anyone to access. However, The Globe depends on subscription revenue to support our journalism. If you are able, please subscribe to globeandmail.com. If you are already a subscriber, thank you for your support.

Your subscription helps The Globe and Mail provide readers with critical news at a critical time. Thank you for your continued support. We also hope you will share important coronavirus news articles with your friends and family. In the interest of public health and safety, all our coronavirus news articles are free for anyone to access.

Follow related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies