Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Farmers shout slogans as they arrive at the site of ongoing protests against farm laws at the Delhi-Uttar Pradesh border, on the outskirts of New Delhi, India on Jan. 29, 2021.

Manish Swarup/The Associated Press

Gareth Price is a senior research fellow at Chatham House’s Asia-Pacific Programme.

After protesting on the outskirts of India’s capital for two months, hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers entered Delhi on Republic Day. Violent clashes ensued, and while talks between the government and farmers have taken place, the differences between the positions of the two sides suggest that things could be irreconcilable.

The core issue is that Indian agriculture is highly inefficient, resource-intensive and environmentally unsustainable, but also serves as the main source of livelihood for somewhere between 50 per cent and 70 per cent of the country’s population.

Story continues below advertisement

At present, India has implemented a minimum support price (MSP) for a number of crops, primarily cereals, which works to ensure food security and to provide farmers with a base price. However, as of now, it delivers neither food security nor farmers’ incomes; India has large supplies of food stocks, and yet poor diets have ensued, with last year’s Global Nutrition Report finding that 34.7 per cent of children under five years old suffer from stunting. Meanwhile, in many states, farmers are forced to sell their crops for well below the MSP, spawning a rentier class of middle-men, extracting profit between the farmer and the consumer.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government made a number of changes to this system, the most important of which would enable companies to purchase directly from farmers. Indian agriculture produces significant wastage, owing in part to a lack of cold-storage facilities. Bringing corporate India into agriculture could potentially trigger significant and much-needed investment.

But farmers fear that the government plans to remove the MSP and that they will get a worse deal from the private sector. There is also a long-standing aversion to liberalization, even though two decades of economic growth were triggered by such a shift in the early 1990s. Politicians tend to stoke this thinking, too: when governments propose reforms, opposition parties (including the BJP, when it has been out of power) generally assail them, claiming they’d harm the “common man.”

But there’s a further problem. Typically, when countries industrialize, agriculture workers move into emerging industries, sparking improvements in agricultural productivity since food has to be produced with less labour; manufacturing sector jobs then trigger additional employment in the services sector. But by and large, India has bypassed the industrialization stage, meaning that there are fewer opportunities for those potentially displaced from their agriculture jobs. India does have world-leading capabilities in some high-value sectors, such as pharmaceuticals, and in services sectors, notably IT. But its manufacturing sector is relatively small, and the economy as a whole has undergone what has been described as “jobless growth” over the past couple of decades. Its most successful sectors are capital-intensive, rather than labour-intensive.

The government wants to expand India’s manufacturing sector, but there are reasons why South East and East Asia have fared better in attracting investment, including complex legislation, difficulties in land acquisition and restrictive labour laws. In addition, labour-intensive manufacturing is increasingly under threat globally. This all adds up to a worrying vision of a reformed future for agriculture workers, even if the actual outcome would almost certainly provide a net benefit for India’s economy.

Reforms are also needed to create a more environmentally sustainable system of agriculture. The political importance of the farming vote has resulted in state governments providing subsidized electricity to allow farmers to pump groundwater to arid regions to grow water-intensive crops such as rice. As groundwater levels fall, more electricity is required to pump water from greater depths. In Punjab, for instance, the state’s power corporation reported a debt of more than $5-billion in May, 2019 – the equivalent of almost 5 per cent of the state’s GDP – even as a Punjab government report has suggested that the state would run out of groundwater by 2039. In addition, the overuse of fertilizer is reducing both the yield and the nutritional value of crops.

In light of the protests, the government has already rolled back several key elements of its proposed reforms, including promising to continue to provide farmers free electricity – a primary factor enabling sustainable agriculture practices. It has also pledged not to prosecute farmers who burn the cut stalks of grain plants, which has contributed to Delhi becoming one of the most polluted cities in the world.

Story continues below advertisement

But finding a genuine compromise between the government and the farmers will be an enormous challenge if farmers’ concerns about their livelihoods in the immediate term continue to run up against the government’s longer-term objectives to reform and sustainably safeguard India’s agriculture system.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies