Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

During the debate on Oct. 10, 2019, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh hit at Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau and Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer when he said that Canadians 'do not need to choose between Mr. Delay and Mr. Deny.'

ADRIAN WYLD/AFP/Getty Images

There is only one thing I know for sure about the outcome of this federal election: There will be millions of Canadians who will be thrilled when it’s over.

All election campaigns are imbued with a certain amount of hostility and deception. But this battle for hearts and minds has recorded off-the-charts levels of antagonism, with parties openly lying about the intentions of their opponents with little consequence for doing so.

This week, the Liberals held a news conference to talk about the devastating cuts to the public service planned by the Conservatives; there aren’t any. Before that, it was the Conservatives distributing flyers in Chinese and English saying the Liberals would legalize all drugs; this is an utter falsehood. Before that, it was the Tories again, saying the Grits planned to tax all home sales – a total fabrication. All the parties have been guilty of distorting the positions of their adversaries to varying degrees.

Story continues below advertisement

Throw in the poisoned partisan cocktail of social media – and sights such as the Liberal Leader wearing a bulletproof vest at a campaign stop – and one is left to wonder: What is going on here?

“I voted in the advance poll because I just wanted this thing over with,” a friend told me on the weekend. “A group of us all did. It’s been the most depressing election campaign I can remember.”

With less than a week to go, the result of The Most Depressing Election Campaign Ever is more unclear than ever. An election that not long ago seemed to be Justin Trudeau’s to lose has become an election in which Justin Trudeau could lose, quite easily. The Tories sense this.

There are a few explanations for what we are witnessing. The obvious one is that this time, Mr. Trudeau has been weighted down by a new role – the incumbent – with all the travails and disappointments and broken promises that come with it. Throw in self-inflicted setbacks like blackface and brownface and some surprisingly low-key debate performances, and you have a leader and party that has been unable to move the dial in their favour.

The other factor is the unexpected rise of Jagmeet Singh. His highly competent, charismatic campaign is not one many saw coming. In a chaotic, disjointed and often acerbic English-language leaders’ debate, Mr. Singh’s optimism and coolness shone through. In talking about his party’s progressive plan around climate change, he uttered a line that resonated: “I want to say this directly to Canadians: You do not need to choose between Mr. Delay and Mr. Deny.”

It hurt Mr. Trudeau far more than it did Andrew Scheer.

There is no doubt that the New Democrat voters who had previously been unimpressed with Mr. Singh, and who were leaning toward voting Liberal this time around, are thinking again. The NDP Leader is ascendant, possibly orchestrating a late orange surge that can only spell trouble for a Liberal Party hoping for a clear-cut mandate.

Story continues below advertisement

That ambiguity on the centre-left has fired up the Conservatives and Mr. Scheer, who seems to have toughened his tone with Mr. Trudeau in recent days.

In the final countdown to Election Day on Oct. 21, the Conservative Leader has a couple of central tasks. First, he needs keep his base fired up. Despite supporters’ traditional reliability on election day, there were concerns that some of that support might not be as solid as usual, largely because of the indifference many Conservatives feel toward Mr. Scheer’s leadership. It didn’t help that last week, party members were openly speculating in The Globe and Mail about a possible leadership campaign by Peter MacKay if Mr. Scheer fails to finish the job.

But with polls suggesting that the Conservatives have a real shot at victory, there is a far greater chance that supporters will show up to vote regardless of any reservations they may have about the current leader.

Secondly, and as importantly, Mr. Scheer has to continue the unrelenting attacks he has unleashed on Mr. Trudeau’s credibility. The Conservatives know a highly negative campaign could help suppress voter turnout, which would hurt the Liberals more than their own party.

Attacking Mr. Trudeau on the basis of untrustworthiness (see: reneging on electoral reform) and a lack of integrity (see: the SNC-Lavalin scandal) could be a strategy that resonates with hundreds of thousands of Canadians who voted for the first time in 2015, swept up in the promise of a new way of doing things that the Liberal Leader was then offering.

But Trudeaumania 2.0 seems like it was a long time ago now – much like the election campaigns we once knew, which were battles of ideas among political combatants who actually respected one another.

Story continues below advertisement

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies