Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Demonstrators protest against the Tokyo 2020 Olympics in Tokyo on May 17, 2021.

Koji Sasahara/The Associated Press

The 2020 Tokyo Olympics are a complete disaster – and not for the first time.

Last year, they were postponed to 2021 after Japan, terrified of a spectator-free games that still risked becoming a superspreader event in the thick of the coronavirus pandemic, persuaded the International Olympic Committee to shift the Olympiad to an odd-numbered year.

Now, less than two months before the opening ceremonies, Tokyo and other major Japanese cities are locked down tight and have forbidden travel amid a serious COVID-19 outbreak. Given Japan’s slow vaccination progress, it seems unlikely that international fans will be allowed into Japan, or more than a handful of domestic fans into stadiums. Some countries’ teams might even stay away.

Story continues below advertisement

Even though it’s a country that reveres its Olympic stars and has been counting on the Games for a revival of national image, 70 per cent of Japanese citizens now do not want the event to go ahead. And Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga has hinted, albeit vaguely, that he might agree to call them off if the IOC could be persuaded – even though it would mean a loss in the tens of billions of dollars during an election year.

Another postponement would throw the “2020” games into the same year as the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics – which may themselves be on the rocks, as a growing number of countries are considering staying away to protest the Chinese government’s repression of the Uyghur minority in Xinjiang.

The extent of the Olympic wreckage extends beyond pandemics and boycotts, however.

World Athletics president says COVID-19 vaccine a big factor in making Tokyo Games happen

The Olympics’ outdated host-city model should be revisited in favour of a truly global Games

The most recent summer Olympics to be held as scheduled, in Rio de Janeiro in 2016, was mostly a success for athletes and spectators, but was such an expensive waste for Brazil that it’s unlikely that many more countries in the Southern Hemisphere will want to make a serious bid. Of the 27 stadiums and major venues Brazil constructed, almost half now lie in ruins; Deodoro Olympic Park and the 16,000-resident Olympic Village are now being overtaken by nature because the near-bankrupt city literally couldn’t afford to keep the lights on. Despite spending billions (and, infamously, millions in bribes), Brazil saw little lasting benefit: a post-Olympic tourism slump meant that within two years, 16 Rio hotels had gone out of business.

The “Olympic curse” – in which the Games actually drive away tourism because they create a perception among viewers that the host city is expensive and exclusive – has hit most hosts this century. During the 2012 London Games, I witnessed the rare sight of my city abandoned by tourists, beyond the relatively small number who had Olympic tickets; London lost 750,000 visitors that August alone. The 2000 Sydney Games caused a three-year relative tourism loss for the state of New South Wales. The 2004 Athens Olympics produced a major tourism slump and eye-bleeding debt.

After two decades of debt and desertion, followed by the debacle of Tokyo, the IOC faces a dwindling list of countries willing to spend tens of billions on a two-week event that offers few long-term benefits and an increasingly obvious downside risk. After Paris in 2024 and Los Angeles in 2028 – the only really serious bidders on either Games – the list grows thin, as democracies cancel bids by the score amid worries that few countries – beyond dictatorships hoping to burnish their image – will ever bid again.

In the midst of the Tokyo mess, the great actor-director Takeshi Kitano expressed an increasingly popular idea: “The best thing would be to give them back to Greece,” he told an interviewer. “We should return them to the founders!”

Story continues below advertisement

It’s not a flaky idea – in fact, it may be the only viable, non-corrupt Olympic idea left. When the modern Olympics began in 1896, they were meant to be permanently in Greece. The only thing standing in the way has been the notorious corruption of the IOC.

In 2004, Athens built two dozen lavish marble stadiums and a rapid-transit line connecting them for more than US$18-billion, in the vain hope that it’d become the permanent home of the Games. In 2005, I wandered those sites, which had been transformed into pig farms and slum encampments and forests. But they, and the idea behind them, could easily be revived.

Instead of bankrupting themselves on unsustainable projects for a fortnight’s glory, countries could do far more for their tourism by building national pavilions. It would be vastly more ecologically sustainable. And as one analysis concluded, it would “standardize the sporting element, providing a stable setting and climate against which to benchmark athletic performances over time.”

Instead of gathering every four years to vote on a dwindling slate of lacklustre hosts, next time our governments should get together to overcome the IOC’s resistance and give the Olympics the secure home they need.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies