Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

In this Sept. 1, 2017, file photo, members of Myanmar's Rohingya ethnic minority walk past rice fields after crossing the border into Bangladesh.

Bernat Armangue/The Associated Press

John Packer is a former United Nations staffer who is currently an associate professor of law and the director of the Human Rights Research and Education Centre at the University of Ottawa.

Last week, governments and non-governmental organizations co-operated to transfer two Myanmar soldiers, who had admitted to participating in the commission of acts of genocide against the Rohingya, to The Hague, where they will presumably testify at a trial before the International Criminal Court (ICC).

These admissions are noteworthy in that they were made by perpetrators who alleged they were ordered to commit these acts. They will be important for corroborating and linking specific events, commands and detailed conduct with the evidence that exists from victims and independent observers, including satellite photography. The specificity and consistency of the soldiers' testimonies will be crucial in convincing any court – and the world – about the atrocities being carried out in Myanmar.

Story continues below advertisement

But while this news quickly captured attention and headlines, the information per se is not new or even surprising – indeed, it may not be so helpful for efforts to materially help the Rohingya.

Abundant evidence has long been available that is consistent with well-known tactics of the Tatmadaw (as the country’s armed forces are known). In fact, even this latest development is not really new: The same two soldiers recorded their admissions after deserting and being captured in July by the Arakan Army, a non-Rohingya insurgent group in Rakhine State fighting against the Tatmadaw.

There are a number of international efforts to seek justice for the Rohingya and accountability for perpetrators – both individuals and the State of Myanmar. However, the basis for jurisdiction and the prospects of ICC trials are unclear. In principle, the ICC has no jurisdiction, since Myanmar is not a party to the Rome Statute establishing the court, and the UN Security Council has not moved to refer the situation to the ICC and is unlikely to do so.

Moreover, the authority granted to the prosecutor does not cover the crime of “genocide” and is unlikely to do so. The ICC cannot prosecute states or governments, either, just individuals. Myanmar, which has consistently dismissed allegations out of hand, would surely point out that individual soldiers neither plan nor command their actions but sometimes act alone or even contrary to orders, as Myanmar has asserted in some cases it has brought to trial (at standards below international ones for due process).

In the ICC structure, the testimonies and even convictions won’t amount to much on their own. They are unlikely to change positions or policies in Myanmar, much less provide reparation for the victims. And if they’re convicted, the soldiers will almost certainly serve out their sentences in better conditions than those of two-thirds of the world’s Rohingya, who are living in squalid refugee camps, struggling to survive unwanted and unprotected elsewhere or still facing an unknown fate in Myanmar. It is doubtful such “justice” will satisfy the Rohingya or many advocating for them, nor is it likely to trouble Myanmar.

But the soldiers' testimonies may have greater effect in another forum, located across town from the ICC in The Hague. At the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Gambia has displayed some temerity in contesting Myanmar for violations of the Genocide Convention. Myanmar cannot escape this action and faces serious consequences and potentially substantial reparations should the court deliver judgment against it. Indeed, merely on the basis of the ICJ’s order in January of provisional measures imposed on Myanmar, Germany suspended its development co-operation with Myanmar until the Rohingya are repatriated.

Other countries have announced their support for Gambia’s action, perhaps most notably the 57 member states of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation; the Maldives, Canada and the Netherlands also recently announced their intentions to intervene in the case to support Gambia. It bears observing that the transfer of the two soldiers to The Hague required the active co-operation of governments that obviously have a keen interest and, for some, stakes in the matter.

Story continues below advertisement

In contrast to the ICC’s doubtful jurisdiction and the efforts to discredit it, Myanmar pays the ICJ full attention and respect. Remarkably, Myanmar’s State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi travelled to The Hague to “defend the national interest at the ICJ” on behalf of the people and the national army.

While official denial persists and acts of erasure now proceed under the banner of “development” projects in the Rohingya homeland, decisions at the ICJ could roll these back and place a cloud of uncertainty over such projects as the fruits of illegitimate gains.

And so the two soldiers are important in a way that far exceeds their status or personal conduct, because their testimonies could substantially bolster the case against Myanmar itself at the ICJ level. Myanmar government officials in Nay Pyi Taw must at least be discomforted. Meanwhile, for the Rohingya, it’s one more step in their decades-long search for justice and, hopefully, restitution.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies