Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Protestors block the driveway at the courthouse on University Ave. to prevent Sheriffs from executing evictions on Aug. 18, 2020.

Yader Guzman/The Globe and Mail

Ismail Ibrahim and Joey Jamil are associates at law firm Robins Appleby LLP.

Landlord and tenant boards across the country are starting residential eviction hearings again, now that the eviction moratoriums due to COVID-19 have ended in most provinces. It is inevitable that residential evictions are going to rise, having an impact on thousands of households across Canada. A recent Toronto Foundation survey found that between 8 per cent and 13 per cent of tenants in the city were behind on their rent. For Toronto alone, if 10 per cent of renters are in arrears, it means about 53,000 households and 130,000 people are at risk of evictions.

Tensions are running high. Earlier this month, protesters set up a blockade outside a Toronto courthouse to prevent the city’s rental enforcement units from conducting evictions.

Story continues below advertisement

There is no silver bullet that will solve all the problems faced by landlords and tenants. Legislation and financial assistance will help, but governments have to be careful to not choose winners and losers resulting from the COVID-19 crisis. Any new legislation needs to balance the needs of tenants, landlords and taxpayers.

Options on the table include extending the residential eviction moratorium, offering rent relief, implementing a freeze on rent increases and bringing in repayment agreement caps, which will reduce the amount a tenant in arrears needs to pay per month.

Most jurisdictions in Canada, the U.S., U.K. and Australia have implemented some type of eviction moratorium for residential tenants. Advocates for renters in Canada and abroad have asked for extensions, with some arguing for permanent bans of evictions relating to rent arrears from COVID-19.

The extension of eviction moratoriums is a problem. Rent arrears are not solved, but merely kicked down the road. Extensions are also unfair to landlords, as they carry the burden of the arrears. Notwithstanding the financial impact on tenants, landlords need rent to cover their own costs, such as mortgages, property taxes and repairs.

If an eviction moratorium is extended, it should be part of a broader strategy to address what happens at the end of the moratorium and how to assist struggling landlords.

In Canada, government rent subsidies to assist tenants have been implemented in B.C., P.E.I., the Northwest Territories and the Yukon. In the U.S., Congress allocated US$100-billion for a rental assistance fund to help low-income renters for up to two years, but this has not come into law yet.

A targeted rent subsidy program to assist low-income renters who have fallen into arrears due to COVID-19 would be beneficial in Ontario. Such a program would have to balance help for those in need with the burden on taxpayers. Assisting low-income tenants now will likely save taxpayers money in the long run, because as evictions rise, so do other costs to taxpayers, including those for social assistance and health care. Plus, the shelter system was already overwhelmed before COVID-19 hit.

Story continues below advertisement

Alberta, B.C. and Manitoba each implemented a freeze on rent increases during the pandemic. Ontario did not. The province’s mandated caps on rent increases have generally been in the 2 per cent to 3 per cent range the past few years, so a rent freeze will have a relatively modest impact for most renters compared with the more significant market-driven impact on rent.

The supply of rental properties is expected to rise through more evictions, more voluntary endings of tenancies and fewer short-term rentals (such as Airbnb), which should reduce average rents. In fact, the August 2020 Rentals.ca report shows the average rent across Canada for properties listed on its site is down by 8.1 per cent from the previous year. So, it seems that rent freeze legislation is not a pressing issue.

Landlords and tenants are forced into negotiating rent repayment agreements to address unpaid rent. Moreover, the recently-enacted Bill 184 in Ontario requires the Landlord and Tenant Board to consider whether the tenant was offered a repayment agreement as part of an evictions hearing.

One concern with repayment agreements is the power imbalance between tenants and landlords. In these circumstances, landlords may force tenants to agree to unfair terms.

B.C. created a repayment framework to be implemented later this summer to help landlords and tenants. It requires landlords to give tenants until July, 2021, to repay any outstanding rent, as long as the tenant is regularly paying monthly instalments of rent and outstanding arrears. Similarly, U.S. Senator Kamala Harris (now Joe Biden’s running mate) unveiled a plan that would give tenants up to 18 months to cover missed rent payments.

Providing a framework for repayment agreements would likely assist landlords and tenants in their negotiations. Such guidelines may also help the Landlord and Tenant Board in its adjudications to assess the reasonableness of proposed repayment agreements. The framework should act as a guideline instead of providing rigid criteria that landlords and tenants must follow when entering into repayment agreements.

Story continues below advertisement

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies