Skip to main content

Another week, another protest rally held by multimillionaires on the west side of Vancouver who are upset they are going to have to pay a 0.2-per-cent property surtax on that portion of their home assessed at over $3-million.

For many, it may cost a whole $1,500. I’m sure some of you reading this are now shaking in rage, too. Not in sympathy, but in anger at their pettiness. Even with the small increase, these outraged residents will be paying far less in property taxes than homeowners in major cities across the country. But they don’t want to hear that. It’s far preferable to cry: Class warfare! It’s the “socialist” NDP’s way of getting back at the rich, which these victims of the small tax hike believe is the whole point. It’s Premier John Horgan playing Robin Hood, robbing the wealthy to pay the poor.

Many of these people paid peanuts for their homes decades ago. They admit it themselves. It’s mostly blind luck that has delivered them this massive cash windfall, but deliver it, it has. Many are retired professionals, living on wonderful pension plans as well. When they cash out, as they will eventually, they will have far more than they will ever need to live on. And the rest they will bequeath to their fortunate children, who will use it to buy homes themselves, if they haven’t already. Thus, the cycle of privilege is perpetuated.

Story continues below advertisement

There is something wrong with this whole debate. We are devoting unlimited coverage to the concerns of a small subset of society, people who have little to complain about, while paying zero attention to people in their 20s and 30s, many of whom have little prospect of owning a home or being able to retire on a deluxe defined-benefit pension plan, which have now gone the way of the Canadian penny. The road ahead for these people is a lot harder than it was for those millionaires carrying placards, complaining about their lot in life. Honestly, the nerve.

Average house prices across Canada in the 1970s were a fraction of what they are now. This is when many of the people in Vancouver complaining about a small tax increase bought their homes . Today, it takes a person in Vancouver, between the ages of 24-34, 27 years to save for a 20-per-cent down payment on a home. Forty years ago, it took five years. Kids aren’t earning as much, when adjusted for inflation, as the boomers. They need more education, and consequently are graduating with more debt. All of it spells trouble for many young people today, says Paul Kershaw, a professor in the school of population and public health at the University of British Columbia.

He looks at the absurd situation in Vancouver and shakes his head.

“We have an aging population, one that wants and needs more medical care, asking a younger generation to pay more for health care than they did,” Mr. Kershaw told me. “Meantime, house values are disproportionately helping an aging population, while that group is leaving larger bills to their kids’ generation. Is that the legacy they want to leave?”

The prospect of never owning a home, or receiving a company pension of any kind, is a reality for tens of thousands of young adults. Those who live in expensive cities such as Vancouver and Toronto are forced to shell out obscene amounts of money to rent. Likely unable to have a house to one day use as their retirement plan, young people are told their only option is to save. But saving is tough when you’re forking out $2,200 a month for rent, paying off student loans, and making $60,000 a year in some new green industry downtown. For my generation, our mortgage payments were our savings plan.

Benjamin Tal, an economist at CIBC, sounded the alarm a couple of years ago when it comes to the retirement prospects for millennials. He said, given the trend toward lower savings rates and reduced private pension coverage, they face as much as a 30 per cent drop in their standard of living upon retirement.

But, hey, let’s not worry about them. They’ll figure it out, I’m sure. Let’s turn our attention to the homeowners in Vancouver whose $3-million-plus abodes face a minor tax hike. Although they can defer it until after they sell, many don’t want to. So, let’s everyone get together and figure out how we can help these poor, poor multimillionaires.

Story continues below advertisement

Maybe today’s twentysomethings can take up a collection.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.