Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Throughout our recent history, there have been events that have compelled us to reflect on one of the great scourges in our society – the phenomenon of men killing women.

We are experiencing one of those “events” now – the COVID-19 pandemic, which has precipitated a deadly rise in domestic violence and the murder of women by men. There have been at least 10 such killings in the past few months. In turn, this has provoked earnest commentary about the need to respond.

You’ll forgive women, particularly those of a certain age, if they remain cynical about the prospects of anything happening to bring about meaningful change. After all, if the mass murder of women by a Montreal man couldn’t motivate our political leaders to finally recognize the deep, systemic problem in our culture that his rampage represented, what hope is there that the steady drip, drip, drip of everyday killings and beatings of women and girls is going to do anything? A woman is killed in Canada by her intimate partner approximately every six days.

Story continues below advertisement

In the aftermath of the slaughter of 14 innocents by Marc Lépine at the Université de Montréal’s École Polytechnique on Dec. 6, 1989, the federal government established a committee to examine the issue of violence against women. It was given no budget to travel the country and honestly investigate the matter. Instead, it had to hope those truly invested in this issue would come and see them. Despite its limitations, the panel still managed to produce a document that, for the first time, spoke to the plight of women locked in often violent and coercive relationships.

Entitled The War Against Women, the report from the Subcommittee on the Status of Women made 25 recommendations that are as relevant today as they were at the time. Most of them were ignored and remain so today.

“Some of the testimony was gut-wrenching to listen to,” remembers Dawn Black, the former NDP MP from British Columbia who was a co-author of the report. “The stories were horrible and sadly, many of them could be told through the voices of women today.”

The panel proposed several things, including a national education campaign around the issue of violence against women – one that would also make its way into school curriculums. It urged the federal government to take a lead role in ensuring there was adequate funding for agencies providing services to abused women and children. It called for treatment programs for violent men and a task force to examine the issue of family violence in Indigenous communities. Finally, it called for a royal commission into the matter, one that would be properly resourced.

Most if not all of the directives were greeted with a big blank stare from the male-dominated House of Commons.

Much of the testimony found in the report is prescient and spot on. Patricia Marshall, who was executive director of the Metropolitan Action Committee on Public Violence Against Women and Children in Toronto at the time, told the federal committee that the country simply didn’t understand how insidious a problem intimate partner brutality and aggression was.

“We do not get it as a nation,” she said. “We need a national understanding of the nature of violence … the pervasiveness, the impact, the political, social and health costs that women are paying and we as a society are paying.”

Story continues below advertisement

In its conclusion, the committee said Canadian society had no alternative but to work toward a “permanent, effective solution to the endemic problem of violence against women.”

That was in 1991, almost 30 years ago. And very little has been done in the interim to deal with this issue. There are still not enough shelter spaces to accommodate the legions of women who need sanctuary from the vile, low-life cowards who prey on them.

No, today violence against women remains largely a women’s problem. It is up to them to fundraise to underwrite the costs associated with the running of these shelters. It’s up to them to continue pressing for change, even while the urge to give up must be overwhelming. Men, meantime, mostly stay silent about the need to deal with this emergency.

Security of the person is a fundamental tenet of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, one that is denied to too many women in our society.

“Women in this country are being let down by the federal government,” Ms. Black told me this week. “It has been amply demonstrated by those who work in the field how inadequate funding levels are to deal with this crisis and yet nothing is done about it.”

Ms. Black paused.

Story continues below advertisement

“I really don’t want to lose hope, but I have to tell you it’s very, very hard.”

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies