Skip to main content

How many times in talking about the Democrats' lead in the American election have you heard the words, “But look what happened last time?”

As Nov. 3 approaches, Canadians – 70 per cent to 80 per cent of whom oppose Donald Trump – are antsy. They fear a repeat of the stunning 11th hour turnaround that propelled him to the White House four years ago.

The collywobbles are understandable. But if you look at all the differences between 2016 and 2020, less so, far less so. Most of the contrasts illustrate how the Democrats have upped their game while Mr. Trump has downed his.

Story continues below advertisement

The differences, beginning with the coronavirus pandemic, don’t mean that Joe Biden won’t get Hillaried. They don’t guarantee a Trump loss. They indicate, however, that for him to win, it would be even more shocking.

A remarkable contrast is the teeming level of voter enthusiasm on the part of progressives compared with 2016, when they were burned by their low turnout.

There’s a sea change. They are so disgusted with this President that they’re descending on the polling booths in droves. They’re gripped, to borrow a Martin Luther King Jr. phrase, by a sense of “the fierce urgency of now.” Of the more than 70 million Americans who have already cast their ballots, the great majority are Democrats.

As we can see by the increased number of Mr. Trump’s daily hissy fits, Republicans are unnerved. The early voting gives them at least a reality check on what they’re up against. They know they have to play catch-up or face defeat. They have added incentive to turn out on Nov. 3.

One incentive they’ve lost compared with 2016, however, is a Supreme Court pick. Back then, the seat vacated by the passing of Antonin Scalia was up for grabs. The winning party would get it. This time round, having already voted to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the court, they lack that pressing motivation.

The 2016 campaign offered in Hillary Clinton a Democrat whom conservatives loathed. Her own party wasn’t overly enthused. Mr. Biden is no Jack Kennedy, but he is less detested by the one party and more liked by the other.

As Ms. Clinton noted a few days ago, a big difference this time is Mr. Trump has a record to defend. Voters were prepared to take a chance on the bombastic outsider the first time. Less so now. Having promised to drain the swamp, he became the swamp. In keeping, only one in five Americans say the country is on the right track today compared with one-third who held that view in 2016.

Story continues below advertisement

Late in the previous election, Mr. Trump got a fantastic break when the FBI reopened an investigation into Ms. Clinton’s e-mail server on flimsy grounds. The impact saw Ms. Clinton’s seven-point poll lead soon down to three.

Mr. Trump draws no such luck this time. He needed the public-health crisis that’s been draining his support to taper off. Instead, coronavirus cases have been surging.

Mr. Biden did give him a gift in the most recent debate when he starkly declared that he would take the country off fossil fuels. That could hurt Democrats with voters in energy producing states such as Texas and Pennsylvania. There’s also the alleged discovery of a Hunter Biden computer – the “laptop from hell,” as Mr. Trump calls it – that has revived doubts in some quarters about Biden family integrity.

Another variance with 2016 is that while Mr. Trump still has his base firmly behind him, other big voter pools he drew on back then – seniors and suburban women – have moved to the Democrats.

In the previous campaign, he had a strong policy agenda, a new nationalism highlighted by an immigration crackdown and an overhaul of trade policy. This time he has no such agenda.

His unpopularity gives Democrats far more opportunities to score than in 2016. States such as Iowa, Ohio and Georgia, which were out of reach back then, are gettable now and they have a big fundraising advantage over the Republicans to lure voters. Mr. Trump meanwhile is playing defence, trying to hold the states he won, some of them critical ones, by a minuscule margin.

Story continues below advertisement

That still leaves perhaps the best reason for thinking 2016 is a bogus barometer for 2020, it being that Americans, as their history suggests, know when to make a course correction. They’re smart enough not to make a dreadful mistake twice.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies