Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The Washington Post associate editor Bob Woodward arrives at Trump Tower in New York on Jan. 3, 2017.

Andrew Harnik/The Associated Press

Is Bob Woodward’s story from his book Rage on how Donald Trump deliberately played down the coronavirus threat while knowing it was deadly really the blockbuster that journalists are making it out to be?

Or had the gist of the story already come out?

Here’s a headline from the publication Business Insider based on Mr. Trump’s press conference on March 31:

Story continues below advertisement

"Trump just acknowledged downplaying the coronavirus threat: ‘I knew it could be horrible.’ "

The first paragraph reads as follows: "President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he knew from the start that thousands of Americans could die from the novel coronavirus but downplayed the threat because he wanted to stay positive and be a “cheerleader” for the country."

At that press conference more than five months ago, reporters peppered the President with questions. "So you knew it was going to be this severe when you were saying, “This is under control?”

“I thought it could be,” Mr. Trump responded. “I knew everything. I knew it could be horrible and I knew it could be maybe good.”

But he added that he didn’t want to be negative and frighten the American people. “It’d be so much easier for me to come up and say, ‘We have bad news. We’re going to lose 220,000 people, and it’s going to happen over the next few weeks.’”

While all this was on the record in Business Insider and other publications, the media responded to the same basic points made in Rage with rage. Like they were, to use CNN’s words, a “startling revelation.”

Mr. Woodward’s book has Mr. Trump making the points in stronger, starker language. There is more detail. It fleshes the story out. His interviews with the President make it clear that Mr. Trump was willfully lying.

Story continues below advertisement

But it was hardly a bombshell meriting such media fury.

It was the force of Mr. Woodward’s reputation that helped stoke the story. He is, legitimately in my view, regarded as the pre-eminent American journalist of the past half century. In Rage, he solidifies that reputation, gaining fantastic access to the President and his associates – access other journalists can only dream of – and delivering an abundance of intriguing material.

It wasn’t his doing that the media went bananas over the segment on the playing down of the virus. Chalk it up to journalist amnesia.

The Democrats weren’t complaining. What a gift to them. Joe Biden was quick out of the gate. “It was a life-and-death betrayal of the American people,” he said of how Mr. Trump behaved. “It’s beyond despicable. It’s a dereliction of duty, a disgrace.” Mr. Trump knew “how deadly it was. He knew and purposely played it down,” Mr. Biden added. “Worse, he lied.”

The story has far-reaching importance because it brings the President’s performance on the coronavirus back to where it deserves to stand – at the top of the pack of election issues.

In the face of his feeble response to the pandemic, a failure that has likely cost the country thousands of lives, Mr. Trump has been trying to change channels and make law and order the dominant story, even though it has nowhere near the equivalent seriousness.

Story continues below advertisement

The Democrats can also be thankful for the media feeding frenzy touched off by The Atlantic magazine’s assertion that Mr. Trump in 2018 called fallen American troops “losers” and “suckers.”

The story, based on anonymous sources, contained those two explosive adjectives and not much else. It was from a virulently anti-Trump publication.

Some other journalistic organs have corroborated the story, but with only anonymous sources as well. My suspicion is that Mr. Trump did use the appalling descriptives. He habitually engages in flights of hyperbole and brutal name calling.

But I think editors of most publications would have demanded names to go with the words before publishing the piece, especially as it appeared during an election campaign.

Gaining far less media focus, as it is overshadowed by the Woodward book, is the memoir Disloyal, by Mr. Trump’s former long-time confidant turned squealer, Michael Cohen. It depicts Mr. Trump as “a cheat, a liar, a fraud, a bully, a racist, a predator, a con man.”

What impact all the pummelling will have on the President’s standing is not certain. The state of play in American politics is such that most alleged wrongdoing gets attributed to partisanship. The people and the players don’t examine it on its merits as much as on its origins.

Story continues below advertisement

The condemnations in The Atlantic and by Mr. Cohen will be written off to a large extent as bias. Though the big news from the Woodward book is old news, it will carry more weight. The legendary journalist has eighteen taped interviews with Mr. Trump. He lets the President’s own words do the talking. And the slaying.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Coronavirus information
Coronavirus information
The Zero Canada Project provides resources to help you manage your health, your finances and your family life as Canada reopens.
Visit the hub

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies