Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Tony Keller is the editorial page editor at The Globe and Mail

The threat of a strike may have passed, but stay tuned for a lot more controversy surrounding Canada Post in the coming weeks.

First up, the advisory panel on the future of the post office, created by the Liberal federal government, will issue its findings. Its job is to tell the government how to live up to its election platform – remember, the Liberals promised to "stop Stephen Harper's plan to end door-to-door mail delivery." (It was the post office's plan, not Mr. Harper's, but whatever.) The government also says it won't privatize Canada Post, but everything else is on the table. The panel is supposed to report by the end of the summer.

Story continues below advertisement

In the fall, a parliamentary committee will hold cross-Canada hearings. And then the Trudeau government has to figure out what it wants to do – and what it is going to order Canada Post to do, or stop doing. Also some time this fall, the Ontario Court of Appeal will likely release its decision on the dispute that started all of this: Whether Canada Post has the right to plunk down thousands of home-delivery-replacing communal mailboxes wherever it likes, even in the face of opposition from residents and cities. (Remember Montreal mayor Denis Coderre and his jackhammer?)

That court decision matters because Canada Post's original plan to save money – by ending home delivery – depends on its power to steamroll unwilling local governments, forcing them to accept new facilities on their land, rent-free. That power was given to the company by federal law, crafted back when Canada Post's core business was delivering mail. But that's not what the world looks like anymore.

Related: The Canada Post feud: Five things to know about their bottom line and the future of mail

The Canada Post of today sees itself as an e-commerce fulfilment company. It has a profitable and growing franchise delivering packages to people who shop online – that's the future it's planning for. It also turns a profit on courier services, logistics support for businesses and junk mail. In 2015, Canada Post delivered 4.9 billion pieces of junk mail – or about 1.2 billion more items than it delivered in the mail category.

That's because regular mail is a business in rapid decline. Most of the volume has always been utilities and banks, sending out monthly statements and bills. And every year, more of us realize that we don't need to get a physical hydro bill, or return payment by cheque. That's why the number of letters has fallen by more than a third over the past decade.

It's also why the company's annual report says that, "for Canada Post, 2016 will be another crucial year in transforming the business from a mail-centric model to a parcel-centric business."

I'm not unhappy about any of this, and I suspect most Canadians are in the same boat. We don't hate the post office; we just don't use it as much as we used to. It's a question of changing technology. We aren't relying on a 19th-century letter-delivery system to tell us, a month from now, what we did in our online bank account last night.

Story continues below advertisement

You can't blame Canada Post managers for recognizing reality. It's no surprise they want to focus on what makes money – packages, courier services and junk mail – while cutting costs in the shrinking business of delivering one-price-regardless-of-destination letters.

The only thing I'm mad at Canada Post about is the thing that caused Mr. Coderre to go ballistic. Crowded urban neighbourhoods simply don't have room for the thousands of ugly super-mailboxes Canada Post wants to drop on them. In suburbia, they're an inconvenience, but in a city, with so many more residents per block and so little public space, they and the litter they spawn (tribute to the company's success in junk mail) will be major eyesores. Canada Post's money-saving strategy is actually Canada's most ambitious urban de-beautification program. And that plan is only possible because the law currently gives Canada Post a benefit enjoyed by no other business: It can take over public land, free of charge. Any other business would have to rent real estate. And if Canada Post had to rent the space for its superboxes? Its savings from ending home delivery would evaporate.

If that happened, Canada Post would turn to its next best option: keeping home delivery, but reducing its frequency. That's what New Zealand Post did last year, switching from daily to three times a week for regular mail – while keeping daily drops for higher-priced and profitable package, business and courier mail.

The Liberals should let Canada Post pick up that option and run with it.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies