Skip to main content

It's not hard to understand why Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne would try to shut down another debate about the appropriateness of Catholic school funding before the discussion even starts. Revisiting the Confederation pact that grandfathered the "right" of Catholics to their own publicly funded schools has been a career-ending proposition for almost every Ontario politician who's dared.

Sooner rather than later though, some courageous leader will have to convene Ontarians for a conversation about what kind of public education system best suits a province juggling with the twin challenges of religious diversity and scarce resources. This Premier is not there yet, though the case for Catholic school funding strains evermore under the weight of its own contradictions.

"Our government has been committed to the education system as it exists in Ontario," Ms. Wynne insisted last week in the face of objections to a new promotional campaign launched by the Ontario Catholic School Trustees Association. The social media campaign – which invites parents to "explore the distinctive value" of Catholic education – underscored the competition for students (and per pupil funding) as schools grapple with declining enrolment.

Story continues below advertisement

Emptying schools have become the norm almost everywhere outside the bustling burbs. Despite a bump in enrolment owing to the implementation of full-day kindergarten, fewer kids start school each year than graduate from high school. In towns across the province, half-empty Catholic and public schools sit in close proximity to one another, each with its own overhead.

Why not merge the current four systems (English public, English Catholic, French public, French Catholic) into two linguistic-based ones? In 2012, a ratepayers group called the Federation of Urban Neighbourhoods estimated the savings at as much as $1.6-billion on a K-12 education budget of about $22-billion. Spending will rise this year to $24.1-billion.

The 2012 Drummond commission on streamlining Ontario public services might have been expected to explore the merger issue. But it hid behind the Constitution. That's too bad, since the more credible estimate of savings it could have provided would have informed what remains an inevitable debate.

That said, the principal reason Ontario should do away with Catholic school funding is not financial. There is simply no longer a case to fully fund a sectarian education system whose teachings are at odds with the fundamental values of Ontario society. The Catholic system's resistance to gay-straight alliances is emblematic of the kinds of conflicts that will multiply in our diversity-laden future.

Catholic schools face the impossible choice of diluting church doctrine to comply with evolving societal values, embodied in legislation such as the Accepting Schools Act, or flouting such laws altogether. Either way, they undermine the justification for continued funding.

No one is as aware of that more than Ms. Wynne. As Ontario's education minister in 2007, this is what she said when her opponent proposed extending public funding to all faith-based schools: "They [Ontarians] do not want to see kids segregated from one another …We need an inclusive system that allows kids to learn together, to be together and understand each other."

Still, she was no more ready to tackle Catholic funding then than she is now. She called the debate a "distraction" and ducked responsibility by invoking the Constitution. Plus ça change.

Story continues below advertisement

The Confederation pact that guaranteed Ontario Catholics their own schools is a relic of an era when religion was a proxy for language. Even before Confederation, when Upper and Lower Canada formed one province, Quebec's English-Protestant minority joined with its French-Catholic majority to ensure the protection of Ontario's Catholics at a time when sectarian conflict was rife.

In 1997, invoking evolving societal values and increasing non-Catholic immigration, Quebec easily obtained a constitutional amendment to replace its faith-based school boards with linguistic, secular ones. There is no reason Ontario could not do the same.

As the Canadian Civil Liberties Association has noted, the origin of Catholic school funding in Ontario lies in a mid-19th century desire to protect religious freedom and equality, as both concepts were then conceived. But the continued application of that constitutional compromise "only serves to erode those very principles today."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter