Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa October 24, 2013.

CHRIS WATTIE/REUTERS

"In fact there is no agreement and he hasn't been paid anything," Stephen Harper said in 2006 when reporters on the campaign trail questioned him about remarks made by Alan Riddell who, asked why he'd withdrawn his candidacy from the riding of Ottawa South with just a few days left in the race, said the Conservative Party, fancying another candidate, had offered to pay his campaign expenses – about $50,000.

"The party does not have an agreement to pay Mr. Riddell these expenses," Mr. Harper said, although emails later proved otherwise to a judge's satisfaction: Mr. Riddell sued for the money and won.

Paul Wells, who recounts this small but arguably emblematic episode in Harper history in his timely new book, The Longer I'm Prime Minister, writes that the evidence that emerged during the trial was unequivocal. "It was clear there was a 'binding agreement.' It was clear Harper was in the loop. And it was clear that, even after his party's business became public, Harper preferred to claim there was no such business.

Story continues below advertisement

The story is worth repeating because it demonstrates two of Harper's work habits: a preoccupation with confidentiality and a willingness to use money to make problems go away," Mr. Wells writes before touching upon Bev Oda's extravagances and the Prime Minister's attempt to have his minister of international co-operation pay her way back into the public's good graces. You may recall he defended Ms. Oda until he didn't.

Mr. Harper is what we in the writing business might call a "formula Prime Minister."

Possibly the Riddell story demonstrates a third Harper habit as well: a readiness to claim there's "no such business" when in fact there's a boom-time market of business swirling colourfully around the Prime Minister like the "who will buy my sweet red roses ..." scene in Oliver!

Of course, it's possible our sweet Oliver really doesn't see any of this – is genuinely as shocked as his pantomime-with-much-finger-wagging in the House this week might indicate at Senator Mike Duffy's housing-allowance shenanigans. Perhaps the Prime Minister is still as bewildered as the rest of us that, in an unlikely plot turn straight out of Pretty Woman, Mr. Duffy's $90,000 debt was repaid by the PM's own chief of staff, millionaire Nigel Wright.

"The facts are clear," Mr. Harper said when, on Wednesday, he finally answered questions he has repeatedly answered by saying he has already answered them. "Mr. Duffy now says he is a victim because I told him he should repay his expenses. Darn right I told him," said an apparently outraged-to-the-point-of-folksiness Harper Gump.

Formula-PM had, as is his wont, praised Mr. Duffy after his creative accounting practices became public – just as he had Pamela Wanderlust Wallin (so Groundhog Day) before cutting them both loose, along with Senator Patrick Brazeau, of what turned out to be a very fixed address. This, perhaps not strategically astute, move on the PM's behalf left the three of them with little to lose when they appeared before the Senate this week to fight their expulsion – instigating some quality Canadian entertainment.

Mr. Brazeau gave a performance so overwrought, aggrieved and forgettable it was Tom Cruise-level Oscar-bait. All three senators hinted at a level of destitution straight out of Slumdog Millionaire, attacked randomly like Al Pacino in And Justice For All – but were essentially cornered and throwing themselves off a cliff like Butch and Sundance and Louise.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Duffy tore into the PM with the viciousness of a mobster. Ms. Wallin is apparently starring in Mean Girls. Other women on the Hill are just jealous because she "once garnered the praise of the Prime Minister," she said, setting the feminist cause back to pre-Clan of the Cave Bear.

Some seek a hero in this. Either the PM betrayed innocent senators, or guilty senators betrayed a trusting PM, but every character here seems so unsympathetic and self-serving that surely a film of this affair could only be a European production. Of course, if it's a French film, Ms. Wallin will be an alluring, troubled 15-year-old runaway appointed to the Senate after she hitchhikes to Ottawa from Nantes. Canadians have, of late, been asked to believe equally unlikely things.

Maybe this is why Mr. Harper keeps talking about free trade with Europe when asked about the Senate – he's opening up markets for this mess.

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies