Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

Enmity for organized labour has been a key feature of the Conservative brand ever since the Harper government came to power. Laws imposing contracts, banning strikes, cutting pensions, and limiting union freedoms have figured prominently in the legislative agenda. And throwaway swipes at union bosses, inflexibility, and fat contracts regularly pepper party communications, from ministerial speeches to fund-raising letters.

Perhaps union-bashing was once a potent button for Conservatives. Whatever ailed the economy, they could blame "big labour" – and many recession-fatigued Canadians would agree. More recently, however, the calculus of anti-unionism has changed. Union-bashing may be doing more harm than good to Conservatives (both federally and provincially). How will this influence the Harper strategy leading to next year's election?

A key moment in this sea change was June, 2013, when the government suffered an extraordinary defeat at the hands of Conservative Senators. Bill C-377 (nominally a private members' bill about union financial reporting, but in practice a broad attack on unions overseen directly by the Prime Minister's Office) was amended in the Senate – so dramatically as to defeat its purpose. The amendments were backed by 16 Conservatives, led eloquently by Hugh Segal, who pilloried the bill as "flawed, unconstitutional, and technically incompetent."

Story continues below advertisement

The bill was also denounced by privacy experts, constitutional lawyers, and investment and insurance executives (aghast at the requirement that any union payment over $5,000 must be disclosed). The amended bill went back to the Commons – but then the Prime Minister prorogued parliament, and the whole process started over. The Conservatives re-introduced C-377, unamended, last October, but signalled it would likely die on the Senate order paper.

Fast forward a year, however, and it seems the government wants to take another kick at the "big labour" scapegoat. They want to change Senate procedural rules to limit debate on private members' bills. They've resuscitated C-377 from the dead for second reading, and are also accelerating another anti-union private members' bill: C-525, which makes it harder to form a union, and easier to get rid of one. The new procedures would allow the government to push both bills through with less fuss. Senator Segal, meanwhile, has retired – although that alone won't flip the outcome since the initial vote to amend it wasn't even close (49-33, with 7 abstentions).

C-377 would probably never take effect anyway, even if passed, since it almost certainly violates provincial constitutional authority and federal privacy standards. But that's beside the point for the Conservatives. With a year (at most) to the next election, it is an opportunity to distract voters from a disappointing economy and Mike Duffy, buff their business-friendly credentials, and – above all – motivate their core supporters. A reinvigorated crusade against union bosses will certainly sell well with the hard-core base (the ones who write cheques and hand out leaflets). But will it help with the broader electorate? Not anymore.

In addition to the C-377 debacle, several other labour issues unfolded badly for the Conservatives (and their provincial counterparts) in the last year. Ottawa backtracked dramatically on its Temporary Foreign Worker program in the face of public outrage – opposition led by unions. In Ontario, PC leader Tim Hudak self-immolated in fiery anti-union rhetoric. In B.C., Premier Christy Clark's attempt to paint the teacher's union as public enemy number one backfired; she finally withdrew (after a needless three-month strike) her plan to unilaterally seize control over classroom sizes. Even in Alberta, the least unionized province, new Premier Jim Prentice quickly abandoned two confrontational (and likely unconstitutional) anti-union pension bills, told by MPPs they were hurting badly in their constituencies.

Where unions were once portrayed as greedy and unruly, they now survive (and even win) by successfully positioning themselves as defenders of public interest and universal rights. This reframing of the union message has been essential in their recuperated influence. Unions cannot be seen as "special interest" groups, enriching their own members at the expense of consumers or taxpayers. They must be seen as an institutional bulwark on the side of all those who work for a living, defending vulnerable people within a social order that is increasingly lopsided. As unions succeed in that effort, the political value of union-bashing will continue to erode.

But this lesson will likely be lost on the federal Conservatives. They are desperate to change the political channel, and eager to throw one more bone to their strident base. In that case, it is safe to expect more anti-union rhetoric in the year ahead.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies