Skip to main content

Stockwell Day is upset that he is being quizzed on his support for creationism. The Canadian Alliance Leader resents the probing of his conviction that the Biblical account of how life originated on this planet is a scientifically supported theory capable of being taught alongside evolution. He says the inquiries are intrusive and irrelevant to the election campaign.

Mr. Day is right that a person's religious beliefs are a private matter. The Charter of Rights guarantees what we in Canada are fortunate to be able to take for granted: the freedom of conscience and religion and, for that matter, lack of religion.

Where Mr. Day errs is in arguing that his private commitment is none of the public's business. He has made it the public's business by running for prime minister and proposing policies that may be coloured by his instincts and convictions. To take an obvious example, the duty he owes to God compels him not to work on Sunday. That conviction will be tested when, if he becomes prime minister, his duty to the country obliges him to respond to national or world events on his Sabbath.

Story continues below advertisement

Take another example. Although education is a provincial responsibility, he has pledged that any federal government he headed would give taxpayers' money to parents who want to send their children to private religious schools. And what do many religious schools offer that the secular public system doesn't? As the assistant pastor and administrator of Bentley Christian School in Alberta between 1978 and 1985, Mr. Day knows one answer: a curriculum with a far different view of how much credence children should give to the scientific theories of evolution and the story of creation in Genesis. He made clear his own feelings on the matter this week when he said, "There is scientific support for both creationism and evolution."

It is important to emphasize that faith and science are not enemies. They are merely separate spheres. It is entirely possible to have faith that God created the building blocks of the universe, among them the relationship of matter and energy, and at the same time to appreciate with an open mind the scientific evidence of how those blocks have interacted and the course of natural history that has followed. The big-bang theory, the fossil records that support or contradict Darwin's theories of evolution -- all can be read as evidence of the natural unfolding of a divine plan.

Where faith and science become incompatible is in the rigid refusal to accept the signposts of science where they conflict with articles of faith. In a documentary aired Tuesday on CBC-TV's The National,the head of natural science at Red Deer College in 1997 said he heard Mr. Day tell a crowd that the world is only several thousand years old and that men walked with dinosaurs. While that may be consistent with the literal word of Genesis, it is inconsistent with the evidence uncovered by geologists and others, and subjected to tests and challenges, that Earth is billions of years old and that, The Flintstones notwithstanding, dinosaurs died off tens of millions of years before humans first appeared.

Mr. Day says the documentary denied him a chance to reply. He has that chance in the public arena between now and Nov. 27. Does his faith so preclude an acknowledgment of scientific discoveries and scrupulous tests that nothing could convince him that humans and dinosaurs weren't neighbours? Or does that interpretation do him a gross disservice?

If the former, his strong views on what is and isn't good science may affect how he arranges the expanded funding for basic science that his party promises once in power. It is Mr. Day's choice how to address such concerns, but he can't write them off as irrelevant.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies