Skip to main content

What is the half-life of an Alberta premier? Long-serving Ralph Klein retired in 2006 after being humiliated by tepid support (55 per cent) in a leadership review. His successor Ed Stelmach governed for five years before being pushed out by opponents in his own cabinet. Alison Redford lasted only two and a half years before resigning under pressure from her caucus and the party at large. Now an acting premier will preside until a leadership race can be concluded, then a new premier will probably call an election within a few months. We are approaching Andy Warhol's 15 minutes of fame.

With so many failures of leadership, it is becoming clear that the problem is not the ability or character of the leaders but the ethos of the Progressive Conservative Party of Alberta. The party has been in power so long that its leading members have come to regard taxpayers' money as a resource to spend for their own welfare, whether personal or political.

Under extreme pressure from voters, Premier Redford did make some changes when she first came to power. She revised a compensation system that had been designed to conceal how much MLAs were really paid, and she cancelled the extra pay of members of a legislative committee that never met. But she got trapped by other perks, most notably first-class world travel, plus the four private jets that were at the beck and call of the Alberta government for trips within North America.

Story continues below advertisement

After 43 years without creative alternation of government, Alberta has developed layer upon layer of hard-to-defend perks for people in government and the senior civil service. Why does Alberta need a fleet of four government planes when British Columbia, a larger and more mountainous province, gets by without any? Why is the premier's chief of staff paid $316,000 a year, much more than Barack Obama's chief of staff and very nearly as much as Prime Minister Stephen Harper? Why do political staffers who voluntarily resign get large severance payments?

But the real abuse is not the $45,000 that Ms. Redford blew on a trip to South Africa, but the government's recent $45-billion budget. The Finance Minister trumpeted a $2.6-billion operating surplus, but the true bottom line is the $3.9-billion borrowing requirement. The pseudo-surplus in the operating budget was created by moving capital expenses into a separate capital budget, largely financed by borrowing. The government likes to justify this borrowing to build schools, hospitals, and roads by comparing it to a homeowner's mortgage, but the analogy is specious. A house creates income for the owner by substituting for rent, appreciates in value over time, and can be sold to recover the capital investment. Government "assets" create spending obligations rather than income, depreciate over time, and are almost impossible to sell. Who wants to buy a used hospital?

It is shocking that the Redford government could not balance Budget 2014 when conditions were so favourable. Interest rates are low, oil prices remain high, bitumen is being moved by rail in lieu of pipeline, natural gas prices rebounded because of the cold winter, and the federal government increased transfer payments to Alberta for health care. Is there a term for a benign "perfect storm"? Except for the effects of the 2013 floods, that's what Alberta has experienced over the last year. If the Redford government couldn't balance the budget this year, what would it have done when some of these conditions became less favourable, as inevitably would happen?

No one can predict who will compose the government two years from now. Maybe the Wildrose opposition, maybe a revitalized PC party under new leadership, maybe a political grouping that doesn't even exist yet. But the lessons of Ms. Redford's fall are obvious. Anyone who hopes to survive in government for more than a few months will have to level with taxpayers. Come clean about all the hidden perks and entitlements, and cancel those that cannot be justified in open debate. Stop telling fairy tales about the budget. Go back to a reporting system that taxpayers can understand. Be honest about the deficit, and produce a realistic plan for balancing the budget within a few years (Jim Flaherty is now available to consult). The people are roused, and anyone who tries to ignore the demand for transparency will be gone, gone, gone.

Tom Flanagan is a Distinguished Fellow of the School of Public Policy, University of Calgary. He managed the Wildrose campaign in the 2012 Alberta election.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter