Skip to main content

The B.C. election was proceeding along fairly uneventfully until NDP Leader Adrian Dix decided to make it interesting.

Mr. Dix used Earth Day to reverse his previously held position on the proposed $5.4-billion Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion. As recently as two weeks ago, Mr. Dix was saying that – as a matter of principle – he would not prejudge the pipeline builder's plans until they'd been filed as part of the federal environmental review process later this year. Suddenly, he couldn't wait any longer.

Now Mr. Dix is against the project, saying he doesn't believe Vancouver should become a major oil exporting port. Kinder Morgan wants to triple its current pipeline capacity, from 300,000 barrels a day to 890,000 – a move that would significantly increase tanker traffic in the port of Vancouver.

Story continues below advertisement

While surprising, the NDP Leader's position isn't the roll of the dice it might seem. There are plenty of people in the province who agree with his position, and not just those who make up the enviro brigade. Support for the expanded pipeline is particularly low in the Vancouver area. Many First Nations groups don't want it, either. That said, it's widely accepted that Mr. Dix jumped off his earlier stand because of the threat an ascendant Green Party poses for him.

There's no doubt the NDP weighed the benefits of coming out against the pipeline proposal with the downside risks. For instance, Mr. Dix is sure to lose some support for flip-flopping on a matter of principle for crass political purposes. But he must also deal with the possible instability he has created in the province's investment climate.

As fate would have it, this meshes nicely with the election theme that the Liberals have been hammering home: that they are the party of economic development and jobs, while the NDP represents higher taxes and financial Armageddon. Against the backdrop of Mr. Dix's Kinder Morgan disclosure, the Liberals' overarching campaign narrative has found new resonance.

"I believe in getting to yes with economic development and Adrian Dix starts from no," Premier Christy Clark said at a campaign stop in Sicamous this week. "He's not talking about growing economic development, he's talking about growing government."

Campaign rhetoric, to be sure. But Mr. Dix's move has given Ms. Clark some fresh material to work with. There's little question that the NDP Leader's unexpected tack will raise alarms in the very business community he's been working hard to calm regarding his possible rise to power.

Kinder Morgan has already spent millions developing a proposal it plans to submit to the federal environmental review process. How must the company feel knowing that all that work (and money) will have been a waste if Mr. Dix forms the next government? Kinder Morgan says it will press ahead, but why?

Mr. Dix says he also wants to develop a made-in-B.C. environmental approval process – one that trumps the review procedure for which the federal government is responsible. If Mr. Dix's earlier outright rejection of the Northern Gateway project didn't send a clear signal to Prime Minister Stephen Harper that an NDP government in B.C. will be a handful, his decision on Kinder Morgan should erase any doubts.

Story continues below advertisement

Nor can Alison Redford's government in Alberta be too thrilled about what she's hearing from across the mountains. Mr. Dix's pronouncement has pan-national implications.

Mr. Dix, of course, is certainly allowed his position, but it raises legitimate questions about future resource development in B.C. What's the point, for example, of having an environmental review process if the government is going to decide ahead of time what it's going to allow and what it's not? Resource development has provided much of B.C.'s prosperity for generations. By its very nature, it's environmentally invasive. There are generally risks associated with it, ones you try to mitigate as best as possible.

Mr. Dix has sent a chill throughout the resource sector. It's fine to nix these projects and the money and jobs that come with it, but what do you replace them with? The NDP Leader knows how important resource revenues are to the provincial treasury. They help pay for everything from health care to education. What will he replace them with if he starts killing every project being opposed by environmentalists?

This is a question Mr. Dix will quickly have to answer should he win the May 14 vote.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies