Skip to main content

The new Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC) complex is pictured in Ottawa on October 15, 2013.. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Inch by inch, the Communications Security Establishment Canada is becoming a little less mysterious. Scruples about the privacy of Canadians are more in evidence, though questions persist.

Much of the credit is due to Jean-Pierre Plouffe, a former judge who is now the commissioner of CSEC (that is, its watchdog).

CSEC, like its four colleagues in the Five Eyes group of foreign signal-intelligence agencies (the United States, Britain, Australia and New Zealand, is not allowed to engage in surveillance of the people of its own country.

Story continues below advertisement

But of course some signals cross borders, and electronic communications coming from one country may arrive in Canada – and get picked up along the way.

Mr. Plouffe's annual report on CSEC is the first to put a precise number – 66 – on electronic communications of Canadians that have been "unintentionally intercepted" and at least temporarily kept by the agency in a year. He examined them all himself, and his staff did further scrutiny.

Of these, 41 were used in CSEC reports, with Canadian names "suppressed." The other 25 have been kept for future use. That still leaves open how many Canadian citizens and residents were, so to speak, repeat customers. In any case, these two-digit numbers are not very alarming.

On the other hand, Mr. Plouffe said CSEC staff didn't always accurately assess which messages didn't need to be kept as "essential to international affairs."

As Craig Forcese, a law professor at the University of Ottawa, said on Twitter, this helps those who struggle to see more than the tip of the iceberg that is CSEC.

Yet recently, a skillful amateur, Bill Robinson of London, Ont., has all but proved that CSEC used Canadians' private metadata through WiFi at Pearson Airport in Toronto, in order to engage international networks – perhaps not quite interception, but not unintentional, either.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter