Skip to main content

A year ago, the Liberals won election on a platform that promised to undo and reverse many acts of the Harper government. Among the most popular with a core group of Liberal and NDP voters was the pledge to "repeal the problematic elements of Bill C-51, and introduce new legislation that better balances our collective security with our rights and freedoms." The Liberal platform was specific on precisely how that would be accomplished. A year later, however, the Liberals have barely started down their promised road map.

Last week, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale and his counterpart at Justice, Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould, announced a public consultation on national security issues, one of the (perfectly sensible) promises in the Liberal platform. They also put off amending Bill C-51 until sometime after those consultations.

But a year ago, on the campaign trial, that's not exactly what the Liberals promised. In fact, it's exactly not what they promised.

Story continues below advertisement

The Liberal platform said the government "will introduce new legislation" touching on C-51 in eight specific ways. And after introducing a bill including that eight-point plan, it promised to "launch broad public consultations." It has now reversed the order.

The steps the Liberals promised but have yet to take include "guaranteeing that all Canadian Security Intelligence Service warrants respect the Charter," ensuring that C-51 does not limit "lawful protest and advocacy," narrowing "overly broad definitions" in C-51, such as "terrorist propaganda," and "limit Communications Security Establishment's powers by requiring a warrant to engage in the surveillance of Canadians."

The government has come through on two of the eight items: It is improving parliamentary oversight of Canada's intelligence agencies and, in the wake of the Aaron Driver incident, it announced the creation of the promised "Office of the Community Outreach and Counter-radicalization Co-ordinator."

The question of intelligence and terrorism is a complicated one. Who can be against study followed by action? Not us. But on the campaign trail, that's not what the Liberals promised. They had answers, not questions. Not any more.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter