Skip to main content

Petronas CEO Shamsul Abbas speaks during the LNG conference in Vancouver, B.C. Wednesday, May 21, 2014. Malaysia's Petronas is threatening to quit a proposed liquefied natural gas project on British Columbia's north coast, complaining the government hasn't done enough to convince the oil and gas company that it would be worthwhile to invest billions of dollars, the Financial Times reported Thursday. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward

JONATHAN HAYWARD/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Shamsul Abbas, the CEO of Petronas, the state-owned Malaysian oil-and-gas company, has not given up on British Columbian liquefied natural gas – not yet anyhow. He arrived in B.C. on Friday, having expressed his displeasure with the province's government in the Financial Times on Thursday. As a prospective multibillion-dollar investor in B.C.'s natural gas, he was striking a pose for negotiating purposes.

Even so, he may have a legitimate point.

The Liberal government of B.C. is planning to table a bill later this year, which would establish a special income tax on liquefied natural gas. That would be on top of regular corporate income tax and the companies' payment of royalties for use of a province's underlying natural resources.

Story continues below advertisement

The B.C. government asked Ernst & Young to compare its fiscal-framework plans for LNG to those already in place in Australia and five American states: Alaska, Georgia, Louisiana, Oregon and Texas. The firm concluded that the B.C.'s taxes and royalties on LNG, including the new tax, would be competitive with the other jurisdictions. But E & Y cautiously did not "comment on the appropriateness" of any of these fiscal frameworks, neither the existing ones elsewhere nor the projected B.C. plan.

Premier Christy Clark, Mike de Jong, the Minister of Finance, and Rich Coleman, the Minister of Energy, may have good explanations for what looks like double taxation on a particular industry. If it were just a matter of asking LNG enterprises to contribute a fair share of the cost of roads and other new public infrastructure in remote parts of northern B.C., a new revenue source would make eminent sense. But the current plan, for an extra tax specific to one industry, doesn't seem like a good precedent.

Mr. Abbas would not have come to Canada at all, nor would he have spoken out prior to his visit, if he wasn't interested in building an LNG business in B.C. This looks like negotation via media. But in the process, he's raised some good questions. The government needs to answer them with the right policy.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies