Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A year of undergraduate tuition at a university in Canada typically runs between $6,000 and $7,000. Expensive? No, it’s a relative bargain compared with the price tag for child care.

The annual cost of higher education is enough to cover just four months of a toddler’s care in Toronto, or around five months in Calgary or Vancouver.

Child care in Canada is expensive – except in Quebec. There, parents pay less than $10 a day. In Vancouver and Calgary, the median cost for a toddler’s care in 2020 was about $50 a day. In Toronto it was more than $70.

Story continues below advertisement

In this week’s federal budget, the Liberal minority government pledged to rewrite that story. They’re promising $30-billion over the next five years, and permanent spending of $9-billion-plus thereafter. The goal is to halve the average price of child care by the end of 2022, and get it down to $10 a day, from coast to coast, by 2026.

The model is Quebec. The economic argument is that cheaper child care means more women working, which means a bigger economy and more taxes to the treasury. The Liberal budget asserted the evidence from Quebec is “incontrovertible” and that this program “pays for itself.”

The evidence is indeed promising, though not incontrovertible.

Based on the Quebec experience, low-cost child care does appear to lead more women to enter the work force. Until the introduction of its program, in the late 1990s, Quebec’s level of female labour force participation lagged the national rate by several percentage points. A few years later, the share of Quebec women working had risen to the national level. And it continued rising: The province’s rate of female work force participation in recent years has exceeded the Canadian rate by more than three percentage points.

Last month, Quebec had the country’s highest level of labour force participation among women aged 25 to 54. In Quebec, the male-female gap in labour force participation among people of prime working age was 4.7 percentage points. The national gap is 7.5 percentage points.

The Liberals’ argument that investing in child care pays ample dividends leans on a 2012 TD Economics study. The report reviewed an array of research and concluded that $1 invested in child care could return $1.50 to $2.80 in economic benefits.

The Liberals did not mention one of the TD study’s significant caveats: “Quantifying these benefits,” the report said, “is not an exact science.” Still, TD’s then-chief economist Craig Alexander concluded that benefits “far outweigh” costs. Mr. Alexander, in subsequent assessments, has since become more convinced, in work for the Conference Board in 2018 and Deloitte this year.

Story continues below advertisement

The idea that spending on a child-care program can pay for itself is predicated, in part, on it drawing more women into the work force. Most Canadian women, however, are already in the work force. In February, 2020, before the pandemic, 83.6 per cent of Canadian women aged 25 to 54 were in the labour force, versus 87 per cent in Quebec. If a national child-care program closed that gap, it would have a positive economic impact. But it would be relatively small. Perhaps that’s why the budget estimated that taking Quebec’s child-care program national would speed up economic growth by just 0.05 per cent each year for two decades.

Costs and returns are one thing, but what would the actual child care look like? It’s supposed to be early childhood education, meaning more than babysitting. Potential benefits rest on quality care, delivered by trained educators. In 2019, barely 40 per cent of Canadian four-year-olds were in full- or part-time programs in schools. In countries like Germany, double the kids are getting multiple years of early education.

Research suggests that a better and earlier start in a child’s educational life delivers lifetime returns, for individuals and society. Done right, and it’s especially a boost for lower-income kids. However, one study found that children’s school readiness in Quebec, measured by vocabulary, didn’t show improvement as a result of the child-care program. That’s not a knock against early childhood education; it may be a criticism of Quebec’s program for not doing a good enough job.

Child care in Canada is expensive, and not as educationally enriching as it could be. The Liberals say they want to change that. But the road to that goal goes through politics, and the provinces. More on that in the coming days.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies