Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Canada’s housing market is bonkers. February marked another record month for sales and prices. The cost of a home is surging across the country. The average national sales price, according to the Canadian Real Estate Association, is up 25 per cent from a year ago.

During the previous housing market wildfire, in 2016 and 2017, governments took several steps to cool the unbridled free-for-all. But one tool was never used or even considered: taxing capital gains on the sale of principal residences.

Canada has a Rocky Mountains-high list of tax breaks. The Department of Finance enumerates them in its annual Report on Federal Tax Expenditures. Some are small ($130-million in deducted moving expenses for a new job, benefiting about 100,000 people a year), and some are bigger ($3.6-billion of untaxed private health and dental plans, a break enjoyed by some 13 million Canadians).

Story continues below advertisement

One especially generous line item stands out: the non-taxation of capital gains on the sale of principal residences. It will save sellers an estimated $7.1-billion this year.

Ottawa taxes capital gains on investments such as stocks and real estate – but it steadfastly refuses to touch gains on principal residences. Why? The answer is a decision made a half-century ago, by politicians who feared voters’ wrath. Then, as now, taxing the profit on the sale of a person’s home was not a winning idea.

Back in the 1960s, as the country created social programs such as medicare and the Canada Pension Plan, tax reform was also on agenda. A decade-long debate has defined Canada’s tax system ever since. In 1966, the Royal Commission on Taxation published a 2,600-page tome.

Among its proposals? A capital gains tax on the sale of principal residences.

There was a big asterisk: a proposed $25,000 exemption – back then, a reasonable price for a house – so “few home owners would be concerned with a potential tax liability.” Three years later, when Ottawa put out a tax-reform white paper, taxing the sale of homes, with exemptions, was still in play.

Tax reform became reality in 1971, and a capital gains tax on investments was a centerpiece. But the Liberal government dropped the whole idea of taxing principal residences. As finance minister E.J. Benson told the House of Commons, “many taxpayers feared that their homes might still be subject to taxation.” The government chose to “eliminate this concern.”

The issue remains understandably close to Canadians’ hearts, and wallets. Two-thirds of Canadian households own their home. It is usually their most valuable asset. Last summer, after the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. provided funding for a housing study that included a peek at taxation, outrage ensued.

Story continues below advertisement

No one likes taxes. But this unique hole in the tax code is big, and it encourages Canadians to sink ever more money into real estate. Since 2000, home prices in Canada’s big cities are up 270 per cent. A $300,000 home has become a $1.1-million home.

Sometimes it feels like current rules, such as this tax break, are the way things have always been, and must always be. But for decades, there were no taxes on capital gains on stocks, and then in 1971 there were, at an inclusion rate of 50 per cent – meaning tax applied to only half the gain. By 1990, Brian Mulroney had increased that to 75 per cent, and Jean Chrétien cut it back to 50 per cent in 2000.

Today, the housing tax break is one whose biggest benefits flow to those with the deepest pockets. A $200,000 gain on the sale of a $300,000 home is tax free, but so is a $10-million windfall on the sale of a $15-million home.

In the United States, gains on a principal residence are taxed – with an exemption of up to US$500,000. It’s a tax break, but with limits – echoing Canada’s long-ago idea.

The likelihood of action on this issue is? Low. Canadians have a lot of money tied up in their homes, and politicians fear that so much as mentioning the idea would be like pressing the career self-destruction button.

But the measure of a thing isn’t its popularity. Canada had the right idea a half-century ago. It’s time to consider taxing capital gains on the sale of principal residences, with an exemption large enough to spare the average homeowner. That idea started life as classically Canadian middle ground. It could be again.

Story continues below advertisement

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies