Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Chief Allan Adam of Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation is walked to the police vehicle during his violent arrest by RCMP officers, in a still from police dashcam video obtained during legal discovery, in Fort McMurray, Alta., on March 10, 2020.

RCMP/Reuters

Twenty-six seconds after four RCMP officers approached Robert Dziekanski at Vancouver International Airport in 2007, they began tasering him into unconsciousness. Justice Thomas Braidwood described those 26 seconds, with great understatement, as “a surprisingly short period of time to make initial contact, establish communication, make a risk assessment, conclude that force was necessary, and conclude that no lesser force option was appropriate.”

Twenty-one seconds after two Toronto police officers entered the hallway of Andrew Loku’s apartment building, and saw him holding a hammer, the lead officer began shooting. At a 2017 coroner’s inquest, the officer was asked: “You spent 21 seconds doing nothing but screaming at Mr. Loku to drop his hammer. Do you agree with that?” The officer agreed.

Police in Canada are often sent into dangerous situations, where they are faced with people who are armed and a threat to life. They sometimes must use force, and sometimes it must be deadly force.

Story continues below advertisement

But Canadian police are far more often asked to resolve situations involving people who are not a deadly threat, or any kind of threat. (Toronto police fired their guns in just three incidents in 2018.) As a society, we have to insist that, in most situations, the police do not use deadly force, or any force at all.

The best way to make that happen may be to send somebody other than a police officer. Sometimes, a person carrying weapons should be the first responder. But sometimes, they should be the last call.

At the inquiry into Mr. Dziekanski’s death, two police use-of-force experts described the officers’ actions as good policing; one wrote that it represented “a reasonable escalation and de-escalation of force,” and was consistent with “RCMP policy and training.” As a result, though Justice Braidwood criticized the individual officers, he said he was “equally critical of the policy and training paradigm that fosters such poor decision-making.” He suggested that the problem might be, to use that much-overused term, systemic.

Of all the people who came into contact with Mr. Dziekanski over the course of many hours in the Vancouver airport – including several who approached him without fear – why were the police the ones least capable of accurately reading the situation? Why can Mr. Loku’s unarmed neighbours be seen on video interacting with him, only seconds before police arrived and shot him?

Which brings us to “Defund the Police.” Yes, the slogan is terrible, and it encourages an us-vs.-them dynamic, insinuating that “we” the public finally get to really stick it to “them,” the cops. Also: It’s an American slogan, and Canada’s problems, though related, are different in nature and scale. As noted earlier this week, the number of people who die at the hands of police in Canada each year is around 26; in the U.S., it is more than 1,300.

But reasonable advocates for “defunding” the police usually start by explaining that they don’t actually want to defund the police. They want to spend somewhat less on policing, and somewhat more on social services. Which is not unreasonable. Even better: Just spend more on those other services, particularly mental health. Police are called to fill the mental-health gaps when there is no one else to call.

Former Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci, in his inquiry after the death of Sammy Yatim at the hands of the Toronto Police Service, said that the “most distressing” realization for him was that the issue was bigger than the police. “The effective functioning of the mental health system is essential as a means of preventing people from finding themselves in crisis in the first place,” he wrote, but “the basic and glaring fact is that the TPS alone cannot provide a complete answer to lethal outcomes involving people in crisis.”

Story continues below advertisement

There are many situations in which only police can provide the peace, order and good government every Canadian wants, which is why all Canadians need to know they’re served by fair, impartial and unbiased officers.

But public safety is always about more than just police. As the Peel Principles of Policing put it, “the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.”

Rethinking Canadian policing to make it so that police are not always the first call, but in many situations, the last resort? It’s a good idea.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies