Skip to main content

Globe editorial: Ontario’s new sex-ed curriculum, and PC party, are stuck in time

Ontario’s long-running debate about sex education re-intensified this week when the Ford government announced it is cancelling the province’s controversial 2015 curriculum and replacing it with one from 1998 that is unquestionably out of date.

Scrapping the 2015 curriculum was one of Doug Ford’s few concise election promises, one that suited the simplistic sloganeering that characterized his startling rise from political afterthought to Progressive Conservative leadership candidate to Premier.

It was not a promise steeped in any sort of thoughtful consideration, or in the Premier’s understanding of the issue. He simply adopted the argument, made by religious groups and socially conservative family organizations, that parents hadn’t been properly consulted about the new curriculum.

Story continues below advertisement

In doing so, he ignored the fact that the Liberal government that developed the 2015 version of the curriculum had consulted teachers, experts and 4,000 parents of elementary school-aged children.

He also ignored the fact that the campaign against the new curriculum – a campaign that actually began in 2010 when the updated curriculum was first introduced, and then quickly withdrawn, by the Liberal government of Dalton McGuinty – was filled with malice and misinformation so virulent that a Russian troll farm would have been impressed.

Opponents shamelessly claimed the curriculum was designed to “groom” children for pedophiles, and that it was the work of a “lesbian-activist,” a reference to Kathleen Wynne, the former premier who was education minister from 2006 to 2010, and who brought the curriculum back in 2015.

Opponents also said it encouraged children to masturbate, confused them into questioning their gender identity and “normalized” homosexuality. They said the mere presence of the words “anal sex” was evidence of a “gay agenda.”

None of these things was remotely true. The 2015 sex-ed curriculum for students in Grades 1 to 8 was, in fact, a neutral and timely document.

As a small part of a much larger curriculum on health and physical education, it gave elementary and middle-school students sound introductions to numerous issues: sexual abuse and sexually transmitted diseases; managing their time on the internet; the dangers of sugary sodas and physical inactivity, and much more.

In its approach to sexuality, it slowly introduced children to the inevitable facts of life, which today include a greater openness to sexual diversity. Children were made aware in neutral terms that sexual orientation was one of a number of ways another person might be different from them.

Story continues below advertisement

It also armed children with information designed to help protect them from sexual predation. And it addressed realities such as cyberbullying, sexting and internet privacy.

None of this will be taught this year in Ontario. Instead, students will learn from a curriculum that is clueless to the momentous changes in society that have occurred since 1998, most notably the arrival of gay marriage and the omnipresence of smartphones and social media.

The Ford government will, in the meantime, develop a new “age-appropriate” curriculum that is “based on real consultation with parents.” Education Minister Lisa Thompson said this week she will move quickly on the file but gave no deadline.

This is a huge victory for the organizations that opposed the new curriculum. But it is one, as we said, based on a deliberate misrepresentation of the content that skewed many people’s opinions of it.

And it is a hugely disproportionate victory. Polls have consistently shown that more Ontarians support the 2015 curriculum than oppose it. But now it is gone, erased from public schools with no timeline for bringing in a suitable replacement, and no thought given to the parents who were indeed consulted and saw the new curriculum as a necessary update to outdated teaching materials.

The Ford government should not have been so one-sided in this issue. Ms. Thompson should have found ways to preserve useful parts of the updated version until her promised consultation could be completed.

Story continues below advertisement

Instead, the government has made an already controversial issue even more divisive. Worse yet, a critical part of the education of Ontario schoolchildren will now be based on a world that is unrecognizable to them.

Ontario NDP Leader Andrea Horwath and activists spoke out Friday in support of the former Liberal government’s 2015 sex education curriculum. Doug Ford’s Tory government says teachers will use the 1998 version of the curriculum this fall. The Canadian Press
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter