Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau prorogued Parliament last month, thereby shutting down committee hearings into the controversy surrounding his government’s close ties with WE Charity, and how the charity was awarded a lucrative contract to administer the Canada Student Service Grant.

His cynical and anti-democratic ploy has largely worked. Without the committee hearings and the news coverage they would have generated, the scandal that has launched a third federal Ethics Commissioner investigation into the conduct of Mr. Trudeau since he came to power in 2015 is fading into the background.

By the time Parliament reconvenes on Sept. 23 for a Speech from the Throne, and the various committees that were probing the WE scandal eventually get back to work, there is a great risk that the public will have moved on.

Story continues below advertisement

That would be a mistake for two reasons. One is that the government’s attempt to circumvent Parliament and dodge accountability should simply not be allowed to stand. The other is that there are two recent revelations that demand further investigation.

The first is that it appears the government tried to mislead the public about who it was that so heavily censored WE Charity documents that were released to members of Parliament in August.

The finance committee issued a production order in July demanding that all government documentation related to the decision to give WE Charity the contract to administer the defunct Canada Student Service Grant be turned over to it by Aug. 8.

The various departments involved submitted more than 5,000 pages of documents, but hundreds were so heavily redacted that it is easy to imagine that there is currently a shortage of black printer toner in federal government offices.

The CBC reported that a spokesperson for the Prime Minister’s Office said the redactions, which were done to protect personal information and cabinet confidence, were carried out by the non-partisan Parliamentary law clerk, as was specifically demanded by the finance committee.

But the law clerk, Philippe Dufresne, has said in a letter to the clerk of the finance committee that the documents were in fact censored by government bureaucrats, not by him, and that he can’t be certain that the omissions were justified.

That alone demands more investigation. But there is also the tantalizing question, raised this week by NDP ethics critic Charlie Angus, as to whether Bardish Chagger, the Minister of Youth, misled Parliament about the nature of a meeting involving herself and WE Charity officials, Craig Kielburger included, on April 17.

Story continues below advertisement

The government has insisted that the choice of WE Charity to run the student grant program was made by non-partisan civil servants. But the language in several e-mails subsequent to the April 17 meeting suggests that Ms. Chagger told WE Charity to take an existing proposal regarding youth entrepreneurship and adapt it to meet the needs of the new program the Trudeau government was contemplating.

Ms. Chagger did not reveal that she’d had the telephone meeting with WE Charity when she testified before the finance committee in July. After media reported about its existence, she told the ethics committee in August that she hadn’t brought it up because, in her mind, it wasn’t about the Canada Student Service Grant.

But in an e-mail to Ms. Chagger on April 22, Craig Kielburger thanked her for the meeting and said that “our team has also been hard at work to adapt your suggestion of a second stream focused on a summer service opportunity.”

Mr. Angus pointed to other documents that also suggest that Ms. Chagger planted the idea of running the student grant program with WE Charity, and that by April 22 WE Charity was the only option the government was considering.

Did an early meeting with a Liberal cabinet minister seal the deal for WE Charity? And did Ms. Chagger mislead a Parliamentary committee about the nature of that meeting?

These are questions that we might have answers to had Mr. Trudeau not prorogued Parliament. The Prime Minister may hope that he has put the serious issues they raise behind him, and that Canadians will have moved on from the WE Charity scandal by the time fall officially arrives. But it is imperative that the committees he shuttered get back to work, and that these troubling allegations are properly examined.

Story continues below advertisement

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies