Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Justice Minister David Lametti delivers his opening remarks during an announcement about the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, in Ottawa, Thursday, Dec. 3, 2020.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Take Two: Ottawa is again moving to codify the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Canadian law. In this reshoot, the Trudeau government is spending a lot of time insisting its bill is both weighty and insubstantial.

The declaration, known as UNDRIP, is a non-binding resolution passed by the UN in 2007. At the time, Canada opposed it, as did Australia, New Zealand and the United States. Three years later, the Harper government reluctantly endorsed the document, but said it was merely “aspirational.”

In 2015, the Liberal platform promised to implement UNDRIP, but didn’t say how. Thereafter, an NDP private member’s bill wended its way to Parliament – “an act to ensure that the laws of Canada are in harmony” with UNDRIP. The House passed it in 2018, but it died a year later in the Senate.

Story continues below advertisement

The Liberals then promised a new government bill, and C-15 landed last week. The bill states that Ottawa “must take all measures necessary to ensure that the laws of Canada are consistent” with UNDRIP. What does that mean, exactly? What impact would UNDRIP have on existing law? Does it create new Indigenous rights, or new duties for the Crown?

The phrase “free, prior and informed consent” appears five times in UNDRIP’s 46 articles. A sixth variation appears in Article 32, which says states shall consult with Indigenous peoples and “obtain their free and informed consent prior to the approval of any project affecting their lands.”

Governments already have a constitutional duty to consult deeply with affected Indigenous groups in the case of projects with an impact on their rights. But UNDRIP’s language appears to go beyond that, which is why opponents see it as containing something more: A veto.

The Liberals insist that is not the case. Last week, Justice Minister David Lametti called worries “misplaced” and said “rumours out there” are baseless. “Meaningful consultation is what is embodied in free, prior and informed consent,” Mr. Lametti said. “The word veto does not exist in the document.”

The government’s position is that while it’s important to pass UNDRIP into law, doing so won’t change anything important in Canadian law. It’s an untenable position, though by the time the courts decide what UNDRIP means – a result which, years from now, will disappoint either backers or critics – the Trudeau government will be long out of office.

The problem is that the word “consent” has a meaning. It normally means the power to say yes or no, full stop.

A year ago, British Columbia passed UNDRIP into provincial law. At the time, Premier John Horgan acknowledged “consent is subjective” and said “courts may have an interpretation.” Not much has happened since. It’s still too early for a landmark court case.

Story continues below advertisement

The Trudeau government’s UNDRIP push has strong backing from Indigenous leaders, and from some in industry. Even the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers supports UNDRIP’s implementation, granted with a big asterisk that says “it must be done in a manner consistent with Canadian law and the Constitution.” Conservative-led provinces want Ottawa to slow down. Ontario’s Indigenous Affairs Minister warned of “sweeping implications.”

So who’s right? It’s impossible to say when looking at the bill’s current wording, and that’s the enigma at the heart of the UNDRIP debate. Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Carolyn Bennett introduced the bill as “an important roadmap for advancing reconciliation,” but it’s a map that could use some illumination.

Backers talk of the urgent necessity of passing the declaration into Canadian law, while at the same time saying it doesn’t change other laws. It’s pitched as a transformation of the relationship with Indigenous peoples, and also no big deal. Which is it? It can’t be both. If it doesn’t change anything about Canadian law, why do it? If it does, then what does it change, and is the change wise?

The Constitution entrenches Indigenous rights, including treaty rights, and a duty to consult Indigenous peoples about industrial development impacting rights. Those obligations were most recently sharpened in court challenges to the Trans Mountain oil pipeline. However, as the Federal Court reminded litigants, the Crown’s legal duty to consult, though extensive, does not “provide [opponents] with a veto over projects.”

Will UNDRIP rewrite settled Canadian law? The question is still unanswered.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies