Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

At long last, Canada’s silly war over carbon pricing is over. As often happens in historic moments like this, the armistice came in the form of a simple statement, this one from Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole: “We recognize that the most efficient way to reduce our emissions is to use pricing mechanisms.”

Mr. O’Toole waved what amounts to a white flag on Thursday as he unveiled his party’s new plan to reduce Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions.

Of course, Mr. O’Toole didn’t pitch this as a surrender. But as the new leader of a party that has spent years portraying the Trudeau government’s carbon-pricing scheme as a “job-killing tax,” and whose previous leaders vowed to eliminate it if ever elected to power, this explicit endorsement of carbon pricing is a complete policy reversal.

Story continues below advertisement

And a very welcome one. Good for Canada, and good for the Conservatives.

Putting a price on carbon – whether through a cap-and-trade system or a tax per tonne of emissions – is the most transparent and uncomplicated way of prodding consumers and companies to change their behaviour. By comparison, government subsidies for electric cars, or for investing in renewable energy, often amount to hidden taxes that only deliver marginal GHG reductions.

Conservatives’ new carbon plan would provide incentives to burn more fuel

Conservatives unveil loyalty-card style of carbon pricing

But while the Liberals in Ottawa have, since 2018, set a minimum national carbon price, and imposed a backstop in the form a federal carbon tax on provinces that don’t play ball, Conservative politicians at all levels have tried to paint carbon pricing as an insidious, ineffective, left-wing tax grab.

This has been in spite of the fact that using the market lever of price to reduce the use of fossil fuels started life as the essence of conservative economic policy.

It has also required Conservative premiers and previous federal Tory leaders to deliberately obscure the fact that the backstop doesn’t apply in provinces that do their own carbon pricing, such as Quebec and British Columbia, and that elsewhere it’s a revenue-neutral scheme that returns almost every penny to provincial taxpayers, in the form of a tax rebate.

In fact, most households get back more money than they pay in federal carbon taxes, and lower-income households get richer rebates than higher-income ones, according to the Parliamentary Budget Office.

But rather than debate these facts, until this week Conservatives had tried to turn carbon pricing into a bogeyman by misrepresenting its attributes.

Story continues below advertisement

In doing so, they painted themselves into a corner, and marginalized the party in the global debate. Canada’s oil industry leaders favour carbon pricing as a business-friendly way of reducing emissions. And the American Petroleum Institute, the lobby for big U.S.-based oil companies, came out in support of the principle of carbon pricing in March.

That sea change in the U.S. just happened to come on the same day that the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Ottawa has the constitutional right to impose a minimum national price on GHG emissions.

Conservative opponents of the federal carbon tax were out of arguments, and Mr. O’Toole deserves credit for obliging his party to accept reality.

He said Thursday that he would scrap the federal backstop if elected prime minister, and would instead create a program where consumers get cash rewards for every dollar spent on fossil fuels – money that would be collected as a carbon tax, and which people could use to buy things like bicycles, transit passes or electric vehicles.

It’s an affinity program, but for green products instead of shampoo and plane tickets. The reward money would go into each Canadians’ personal “Low Carbon Savings Account.”

Canadians now have a choice. They can vote for a party that collects a price on carbon at the gas pump and on heating bills, and then returns it to them at tax time to spend on anything they want. Or they can choose a party that does something similar, but puts the revenue onto a personalized gift card, to be spent on items that reduce emissions.

Story continues below advertisement

The current federal price on a tonne of emissions is $40, with the Liberals planning on raising it to $170 by 2030; Mr. O’Toole says his price will start at $20 and top out at $50.

There’s much to debate about Mr. O’Toole’s plan but, as of Thursday, all parties are at least debating in the same language. That’s because the Conservatives finally accept a critical principle: Carbon pricing works.

The federal carbon-pricing law introduced in 2018 has been ruled to be constitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada after a challenge by three provinces, but what is carbon pricing anyway and how will it affect consumers? Note: This video has been updated to use new wording set by The Globe and Mail to describe carbon pricing. The Globe and Mail

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies