Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
Sale ends in
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
save over $140
// //

For most of Canadian history, when the police were accused of wrongdoing, the police would be called in to investigate. In 1988, after two Black people were shot to death by police in the Toronto area, Ontario established a task force on race and policing. It called for outside oversight, and in 1990 the independent, civilian-led Special Investigations Unit was established, the first of its kind in Canada.

Today, there are 20 civilian-led police oversight bodies across Canada, with varying degrees of power, purview and effectiveness. It’s better than cops policing cops, but the system is not without its problems.

The first problem is ensuring that civilian oversight is truly civilian.

Story continues below advertisement

By one recent count, two-thirds of staff at Canada’s police oversight bodies are ex-officers. That raises questions about conflicts of interest, which risks undermining public confidence.

Some organizations are doing better than others. At the SIU, only one of 13 lead investigators is a former police officer. In contrast, at British Columbia’s Independent Investigations Office, as of 2017, half of its investigators were former officers. The stated goal is to get that number to zero, but there’s no plan to get there. In Alberta, every single one of the 22 investigators on the province’s Serious Incident Response Team, as of 2018, was a current or former cop.

Trained police officers have the necessary skills for the job, namely experience investigating crimes and allegations of wrongdoing. But that experience brings with it the risk of conflict of interest or, at a minimum, the appearance of it. To maintain public confidence, Canada’s oversight bodies need to train and hire more investigators not connected with the police.

A second key issue is that, beyond serious crimes and injuries, police investigating police remains Canada’s de facto system, even with civilian oversight. For example, if a person has a complaint about the conduct of an RCMP officer, they go to the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission. The commission’s first step in a review is to send the complaint back to the RCMP for assessment and investigation. This system, which at the very least gives the appearance of favouring police, is typical of how lower-level complaints are handled.

Does it make sense to refer an allegation of misconduct against the police back to the police? It’s not a great look, and it tends to undermine public confidence.

Other challenges for civilian oversight bodies include a lack of funding, limited powers – the RCMP watchdog can only make recommendations – and a lack of public disclosure and data. On that last point, one helpful solution would be to create a federal database to chronicle the use of force by police across the country.

In 2019, the SIU closed 363 cases, and laid charges in just 13. B.C.‘s IIO has a similar record. Of 127 investigations in 2018-19, it referred three cases for potential charges to the Crown.

Story continues below advertisement

The low number of charges is not necessarily a problem. The SIU, for example, must investigate all cases of serious injury involving the police, even when no wrongdoing is alleged. It may be that the decision in every one of the almost 500 cases above was appropriate, reflecting the law and the facts of each unique incident.

But even if that’s so, it’s still not enough. The public can’t judge the outcome; it can only judge the process. As such the public must have confidence that each and every decision to lay charges, or not, was the result of a truly independent assessment. The same concerns arise with how other complaints against police are handled, if they are resolved through an opaque and internal police process.

For justice to be done, and for the public to believe that it is being done, it has to be seen to have been done impartially.

Civilian oversight remains essential, and Canada has a foundation on which to improve it, but reform efforts have been halting. A recent review in Ontario led to changes that later were watered down. In Ottawa, a bill to open the Canada Border Services Agency to civilian review died last year, but is now back before Parliament.

If a person is hurt in an interaction with police, or when someone alleges that they have been otherwise wronged by a police officer, the case must be fully investigated by an independent body. Anything less and public confidence is undermined.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies