Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Is official bilingualism dead?

That “emblem of Canadian identity,” as the Trudeau government says in a white paper on the modernization of the Official Languages Act released earlier this year, has been emblazoned on the country since 1969, when the act was first passed by an earlier Trudeau government.

On Tuesday, when the government tabled Bill C-32, its long-promised update to the Official Languages Act, that era appeared to be history.

Story continues below advertisement

Where the act was originally about ensuring that Parliament and the federal civil service operated in both official languages, and about protecting linguistic minorities – English in Quebec, French outside Quebec – the new Trudeau government is transforming it into its own version of Quebec’s Charter of the French Language, a.k.a. Bill 101.

Under Bill 32, the Official Languages Act would recognize that Bill 101 “provides that French is the official language of Quebec.”

The amended law would require federally chartered businesses in Quebec to either submit to Bill 101 rules on the use of French in workplaces, or to equivalent rules added to the Official Languages Act.

It would require that all Supreme Court nominees be bilingual – a move being done at the same time that the Quebec government, under its proposed language law update, Bill 96, is doing away with the requirement that, for the sake of the constitutional right to have cases heard in either official language, some provincially appointed judges be bilingual.

It would oblige the immigration department to recruit more French-language teachers to meet the demand for French immersion courses across Canada, and for Ottawa to work with provinces to increase the availability of those courses. And it would increase immigration from French-speaking countries into the rest of Canada.

Bill 32 makes reference to supporting Indigenous languages and Quebec’s anglophone minority. But those are not the government’s priorities. Not at all.

“The existence of a francophone majority in Quebec, with a future in which French is assured, is not only a legitimate objective, but also a fundamental premise of the federal official languages regime,” the government says.

Story continues below advertisement

This is a drastic shift for a law that was meant to support French and English linguistic minorities, not to support the French language outside Quebec, while protecting Quebec from the province’s anglophones.

It’s also a shift that Ottawa is proposing without providing any compelling evidence that it needs to go this far.

The Liberals say that, where the threat to French once came from Canada itself, today it comes from globalization and the internet, which are ruled by a “hegemony of English,” as Official Languages Minister Mélanie Joly said this week. But the global hegemony of English existed in 1969, too.

The Liberals have also bought into inflated worries about the stagnation of French as mother tongue in Quebec, which has hovered just under 80 per cent for years. “Demographic data reveals that maintaining the place of French as a language of integration, work and education requires greater effort,” the government says.

That’s debatable. According to Statistics Canada, 94.5 per cent of Quebeckers say they can converse in French in their daily lives, the vast majority fluently. Saying that won’t get you elected, though, and getting elected is the goal of Bill 32.

It’s no coincidence that the government tabled it just days before Parliament rose for the summer, and that it will die when a much-expected election is called later this year.

Story continues below advertisement

Dead or not, the Liberals will wave Bill 32 around the province during the election and say, “Look what we’ve done to protect the French language,” even though they haven’t done anything at all.

The bill is a cynically timed counterpoint to Quebec’s Bill 96, which invokes the notwithstanding clause in order to curtail the use of English in government, schools and business, and adds clauses to the Constitution saying that Quebeckers form a nation whose official language is French.

Bill 32 – which has the support of the opposition – also signals the end of Canada’s experiment with bilingualism. Ottawa’s willingness to protect your minority language rights now depends entirely on which minority you are a part of, and where you happen to live, all in the name of political expediency.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies